Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36348
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | Factors affecting implementation of a National Clinical Programme for self-harm in hospital emergency departments: a qualitative study |
Author(s): | O'Connell, Selena Cully, Grace McHugh, Sheena Maxwell, Margaret Jeffers, Anne Kavalidou, Katerina Lovejoy, Sally Jennings, Rhona Russell, Vincent Arensman, Ella Griffin, Eve |
Contact Email: | margaret.maxwell@stir.ac.uk |
Issue Date: | 8-Oct-2024 |
Date Deposited: | 9-Oct-2024 |
Citation: | O'Connell S, Cully G, McHugh S, Maxwell M, Jeffers A, Kavalidou K, Lovejoy S, Jennings R, Russell V, Arensman E & Griffin E (2024) Factors affecting implementation of a National Clinical Programme for self-harm in hospital emergency departments: a qualitative study. <i>BMJ Quality and Safety</i>. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017415 |
Abstract: | Background A substantial number of people experiencing self-harm or suicidal ideation present to hospital emergency departments (EDs). In 2014, a National Clinical Programme was introduced in EDs in Ireland to standardise care provision. Internationally, there has been limited research on the factors affecting the implementation of care for people who present with mental health crises in EDs. Methods This qualitative study examined factors influencing the implementation of the National Clinical Programme for Self-harm and Suicide-related Ideation in 15 hospitals in Ireland from early (2015–2017) through to later implementation (2019–2022). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff involved in programme delivery, with the topic guide and thematic analysis informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Results A total of 30 participants completed interviews: nurse specialists (n=16), consultant psychiatrists (n=6), nursing managers (n=2), emergency medicine staff (n=2) and members of the national programme team (n=4). Enablers of implementation included the introduction of national, standardised guidance for EDs; implementation strategies led by the national programme team; and training and support for nurse specialists. The following inner-setting factors were perceived as barriers to implementation in some hospitals: limited access to a designated assessment room, delayed access to clinical input and poor collaboration with ED staff. Overall, these barriers dissipated over time, owing to implementation strategies at national and local levels. The varied availability of aftercare impacted providers’ ability to deliver the programme and the adaptability of programme delivery had a mixed impact across hospitals. Conclusions The perceived value of the programme and national leadership helped to advance implementation. Strategies related to ongoing training and education, developing stakeholder interrelationships and evaluation and monitoring have helped address implementation barriers and promote continued sustainment of the programme. Continued efforts are needed to support nurse specialists delivering the programme and foster partnerships with community providers to improve the transition to aftercare. |
DOI Link: | 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017415 |
Rights: | © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
Licence URL(s): | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
bmjqs-2024-017415.O'Connel Implementation of National Clinical programme 2024.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 647.3 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.