Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36308
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: iVOMS: Instrumented Vestibular / Ocular motor screen in healthy controls and mild traumatic brain injury
Author(s): Graham, Lisa
Powell, Dylan
Campbell, Kody R
Morris, Rosie
Vitorio, Rodrigo
Parrington, Lucy
Antonellis, Prokopios
Godfrey, Alan
King, Laurie A
Stuart, Samuel
Contact Email: dylan.powell@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: mTBI
Eye movement
Eye-tracking
Biomarker
VOMS
Vestibular
Ocular
Issue Date: Jul-2024
Date Deposited: 9-Oct-2024
Citation: Graham L, Powell D, Campbell KR, Morris R, Vitorio R, Parrington L, Antonellis P, Godfrey A, King LA & Stuart S (2024) iVOMS: Instrumented Vestibular / Ocular motor screen in healthy controls and mild traumatic brain injury. <i>Medical Engineering & Physics</i>, 129, Art. No.: 104180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104180
Abstract: Objective Vestibular/ocular deficits occur with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). The vestibular/ocular motor screening (VOMS) tool is used to assess individuals post-mTBI, which primarily relies upon subjective self-reported symptoms. Instrumenting the VOMS (iVOMS) with technology may allow for more objective assessment post-mTBI, which reflects actual task performance. This study aimed to validate the iVOMS analytically and clinically in mTBI and controls. Methods Seventy-nine people with sub-acute mTBI (<12 weeks post-injury) and forty-four healthy control participants performed the VOMS whilst wearing a mobile eye-tracking on a one-off visit. People with mTBI were included if they were within 12 weeks of a physician diagnosis. Participants were excluded if they had any musculoskeletal, neurological or sensory deficits which could explain dysfunction. A series of custom-made eye tracking algorithms were used to assess recorded eye-movements. Results The iVOMS was analytically valid compared to the reference (ICC2,1 0.85–0.99) in mTBI and controls. The iVOMS outcomes were clinically valid as there were significant differences between groups for convergence, vertical saccades, smooth pursuit, vestibular ocular reflex and visual motion sensitivity outcomes. However, there was no significant relationship between iVOMS outcomes and self-reported symptoms. Conclusion The iVOMS is analytically and clinically valid in mTBI and controls, but further work is required to examine the sensitivity of iVOMS outcomes across the mTBI spectrum. Findings also highlighted that symptom and physiological issue resolution post-mTBI may not coincide and relationships need further examination.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104180
Rights: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You are not required to obtain permission to reuse this article. To request permission for a type of use not listed, please contact Elsevier Global Rights Department.
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S135045332400081X-main.pdfFulltext - Published Version528.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.