Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36242
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | Towards an assessment of psychosocial work factors in a multi-level mental health intervention in the workplace: results from the MENTUPP pilot-study |
Author(s): | Tsantila, Fotini Rugulies, Reiner Coppens, Evelien De Witte, Hans Arensman, Ella Kahar, Abdulla Cerga-Pashoja, Arlinda Corcoran, Paul De Winter, Lars Greiner, Birgit Griffin, Eve Hogg, Bridget Leduc, Caleb Leduc, Mallorie Maxwell, Margaret |
Contact Email: | margaret.maxwell@stir.ac.uk |
Keywords: | Public health interventions MENTUPP Evaluation Theory of Change Workplace mental health |
Issue Date: | 20-Aug-2024 |
Date Deposited: | 22-Aug-2024 |
Citation: | Tsantila F, Rugulies R, Coppens E, De Witte H, Arensman E, Kahar A, Cerga-Pashoja A, Corcoran P, De Winter L, Greiner B, Griffin E, Hogg B, Leduc C, Leduc M & Maxwell M (2024) Towards an assessment of psychosocial work factors in a multi-level mental health intervention in the workplace: results from the MENTUPP pilot-study. <i>International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health</i>. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-024-02096-6 |
Abstract: | Background Mental health in the workplace is a growing concern for enterprises and policy makers. MENTUPP is a multi-level mental health intervention implemented in small and medium size enterprises from three work sectors in nine countries. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, delivery, and instruments for the MENTUPP intervention to inform the planning of a clustered randomized controlled trial. Methods We administered items from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire and the Danish Work Environment Cohort Study measuring psychosocial workplace factors. The questionnaire was answered by 382 participants at baseline, of which 98 participants also answered after six months at follow-up. We calculated mean scores of 19 psychosocial factors at baseline and conducted repeated measures ANOVAs to assess differences in eight psychosocial factors at follow-up. We also examined whether outcomes differed between work sectors and job positions at follow-up. Results The construction sector and workers with no or a lower leadership role reported more negative working environment factors at baseline. We observed a statistically significant decline in social support from colleagues and social community at work, and a marginally significant decline in justice at work. For the rest of the constructs, we did not observe statistically significant changes. Conclusions We found significant differences in psychosocial work environment factors among work sectors and job positions at baseline. Contrary to our hypotheses, three psychosocial work environment factors decreased at follow-up. Possible explanations are the utilization of specific psychosocial factors as resources to cope with psychosocial stressors, high participant expectations that were not met by the intervention, insufficient time for structural changes, or the intervention prompting critical evaluations of the work environment. These findings will inform the design and implementation of the forthcoming clustered randomized controlled trial, where they will also be further investigated to validate their significance. |
DOI Link: | 10.1007/s00420-024-02096-6 |
Rights: | This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. |
Notes: | Additional authors: Hanna Reich, Victoria Ross, Chantal Van Audenhove, Birgit Aust on behalf of MENTUPP consortium members |
Licence URL(s): | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
s00420-024-02096-6.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 709.55 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.