Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36109
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Outcomes of home design to support healthy cognitive ageing: modified e-Delphi exercise with older people and housing-related professionals
Author(s): Bowes, Alison
Dawson, Alison
Davison, Lisa
Pemble, Catherine
Contact Email: a.m.bowes@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: E-Delphi
Cognitive ageing
Dementia
Healthy ageing
Home design
Older people
Professionals
Issue Date: 24-Jun-2024
Date Deposited: 25-Jun-2024
Citation: Bowes A, Dawson A, Davison L & Pemble C (2024) Outcomes of home design to support healthy cognitive ageing: modified e-Delphi exercise with older people and housing-related professionals. <i>BMC Geriatrics</i>, 24 (1), Art. No.: 546 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05085-z
Abstract: Background There is emerging agreement that living in a home designed to support healthy cognitive ageing can enable people to live better with dementia and cognitive change. However, existing literature has used a variety of outcome measures that have infrequently been informed by the perspectives of older people or of professional in design and supply of housing. The DesHCA (Designing Homes for Healthy Cognitive Ageing) study aimed to identify outcomes that were meaningful for these groups and to understand their content and meanings. Methods A presurvey of older people and housing professionals (n = 62) identified potential outcomes. These were then used in three rounds of a modified e-Delphi exercise with a panel of older people and housing professionals (n = 74) to test meanings and identify areas of agreement and disagreement. Descriptive statistics were used to present findings from previous rounds. Results The survey confirmed a wide range of possible outcomes considered important. Through the e-Delphi rounds, panellists prioritised outcomes relating to living at home that could be influenced by design, and clarified their understanding of the meanings of outcomes. In subsequent rounds, they commented on earlier results. The exercise enabled five key outcome areas to be identified-staying independent, feeling safe, living in an adaptable home, enabling physical activity and enabling enjoyed activities-which were then tested for their content and applicability in panellists' views. Conclusion The five key outcome areas appeared meaningful to panellists, whilst also demonstrating nuanced meanings. They indicate useful outcomes for future research, though will require careful definition in each case to become measures. Importantly, they are informed by the views of those most immediately affected by better or poorer home design.
DOI Link: 10.1186/s12877-024-05085-z
Rights: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Notes: R E S E A R C H Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article' s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article' s to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Bowes et al. BMC Geriatrics (2024) 24:546 *Correspondence:
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s12877-024-05085-z.pdfFulltext - Published Version2.29 MBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.