Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36096
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Gallagher, Stephen | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Ryan, Ruth | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Cassidy, Irene | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Tang, Wenyi | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Whittaker, Anna C | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-03T00:02:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-03T00:02:18Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-05-16 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36096 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective Antibody response to vaccination is a powerful paradigm for studying the effects of chronic stress on immune function. In the present study, we used this paradigm to examine the interaction between caregiving (as a type of chronic stress) and sex on the antibody response to a single dose of a COVID-19 vaccination; recent research has called for examination of sex differences on health outcomes among family caregivers. A three-way interaction between caregiving, sex and psychological distress was also examined. Methods COVID-19 antibody data was extracted from 165 caregivers (98 females) and 386 non-caregivers (244 females) from the UK’s Understanding Society COVID-19 study. Relevant socio-demographics, health and lifestyle, and distress variables were gathered as potential covariates. Results In a 2 x 2 ANOVA we found the interaction between caregiving and sex was significant; male caregivers had a lower antibody response to the vaccine compared to female caregivers F (1,547), =24.82, p < .001, η2 = .043. Following adjustment, male caregivers had the lowest antibody response relative to all other groups. The three-way interaction model, controlling for covariates was also significant, R2 = .013, p = .049; the conditional effects for the three-way interaction revealed that male caregivers, compared to the other groups had a lower antibody response at both low and medium levels of psychological distress. Conclusion This study found evidence of a three-way interaction between caregiving, sex and distress on antibody response. Male caregivers had poorer antibody response to a single shot of the COVID-19 vaccination than female caregivers and male and female non-caregivers and this was evident at low and medium levels of distress. Our findings will be discussed in relation to the caregiver-and sex interactions during the pandemic. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) | en_UK |
dc.relation | Gallagher S, Ryan R, Cassidy I, Tang W & Whittaker AC (2024) Interactions between caregiving and sex and the antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination. <i>Psychosomatic Medicine</i>. https://doi.org/10.1097/psy.0000000000001322 | en_UK |
dc.rights | This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is a non‐final version of an article published in final form in Gallagher S, Ryan R, Cassidy I, Tang W & Whittaker AC (2024) Interactions between caregiving and sex and the antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination. Psychosomatic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/psy.0000000000001322 | en_UK |
dc.subject | Antibody response | en_UK |
dc.subject | Caregiving | en_UK |
dc.subject | COVID-19 | en_UK |
dc.subject | Gender | en_UK |
dc.subject | Psychological Distress | en_UK |
dc.subject | Sex | en_UK |
dc.title | Interactions between caregiving and sex and the antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2025-05-17 | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargoreason | [Caregiving sex and antibody response_clean version.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after publication. | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/psy.0000000000001322 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 38787544 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | Psychosomatic Medicine | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1534-7796 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 0033-3174 | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | AM - Accepted Manuscript | en_UK |
dc.author.email | a.c.whittaker@stir.ac.uk | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 16/05/2024 | en_UK |
dc.description.notes | Output Status: Forthcoming/Available Online | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Limerick, Ireland | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Limerick, Ireland | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Limerick, Ireland | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Limerick, Ireland | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Sport | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 2015176 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-5461-0598 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2024-05-12 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2024-05-12 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2024-06-10 | en_UK |
dc.subject.tag | COVID-19 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not required | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Gallagher, Stephen| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Ryan, Ruth| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Cassidy, Irene| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Tang, Wenyi| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Whittaker, Anna C|0000-0002-5461-0598 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Internal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2025-05-17 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2025-05-16 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2025-05-17| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | Caregiving sex and antibody response_clean version.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 0033-3174 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Caregiving sex and antibody response_clean version.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 316.64 kB | Adobe PDF | Under Embargo until 2025-05-17 Request a copy |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.