Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35935
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Dryland Performance Tests Are Not Good Predictors of World Aquatics Points in Elite Male and Female Swimmers
Author(s): Selvamoorthy, Ragul
Macgregor, Lewis J.
Donald, Neil
Hunter, Angus M.
Contact Email: ragul.selvamoorthy@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Elite sport, swimming, world aquatics, Bayesian, dryland training, jump performance, FINA points, sports
Issue Date: 10-Apr-2024
Date Deposited: 16-Apr-2024
Citation: Selvamoorthy R, Macgregor LJ, Donald N & Hunter AM (2024) Dryland Performance Tests Are Not Good Predictors of World Aquatics Points in Elite Male and Female Swimmers. <i>Sports</i>, 12 (4), p. 104. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/12/4/104; https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12040104
Abstract: Swim performance can be reliant on strength and power. Standardisation of swim performance in different events, distances, and sexes can be completed using World Aquatics points, allowing for ranking of swimmers. The aim of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to assess whether relationships between World Aquatics points and dryland markers of performance existed in male and female elite swimmers separately and combined. Methods: Dryland tests included Optojump® photoelectric cell countermovement jump, countermovement jump reach with a Vertec® system, standing broad jump using a tape measure, repetition maximum testing in the barbell back squat, barbell deadlift, and barbell bench press. Swim performance data and dryland test data onelite male (n = 38) and female (n = 20) Scottish swimmers from 2009–2017 were collected. Swim performance data were converted to World Aquatics federation points, and Bayesian linear regression analyses examined relationships between World Aquatics points and dryland performance tests:countermovement jump height (cm) using an Optojump® photoelectric cells system, countermove ment jump height (cm) using a Vertec® device, standing broad jump distance (cm), relative strength(load lifted (kg) per kg of body mass) in the barbell bench press (kg/kg), barbell back squat (kg/kg), barbell deadlift (kg/kg). Results: The Bayesian estimates of change of World Aquatics points for a unit change in jump-based measures were: Optojump®—men = 0.6, women = 0.6, combined = 0.4; Vertec®—men = 4.3, women = −1.6, combined = 2.4; standing broad jump—men = 0, women = −0, combined = 0.4. Strength-based measures were: barbell back squat—men = 2.3, women = 22, combined = −2.5; barbell deadlift—men = −5; barbell bench press—men = 41.8. Conclusions: Dryland performance tests are not good predictors of World Aquatics points and should rather be used for assessing training quality and monitoring injury risks.
URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/12/4/104
DOI Link: 10.3390/sports12040104
Rights: Copyright: © 2024 by the authors.Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dryland Performance Tests Are Not Good Predictors of World.pdfFulltext - Published Version239.95 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.