Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Making to measure? Reconsidering assessment in professional continuing education
Author(s): Fenwick, Tara
Contact Email:
Keywords: continuing professional development
assessment of learning
practice-based learning
Education Sociological aspects Research
Experiential learning
Issue Date: Nov-2009
Date Deposited: 31-Jan-2012
Citation: Fenwick T (2009) Making to measure? Reconsidering assessment in professional continuing education. Studies in Continuing Education, 31 (3), pp. 229-244.
Abstract: Drawing on studies of teachers, accountants and pharmacists conducted in Canada, this essay examines models for assessing professional learning that currently enjoy widespread use in continuing education. These models include professional growth plans, self-administered tests, and learning logs, and they are often used for regulatory as well as developmental purposes by professional associations. The essay argues what others have critiqued about such self-assessment models: that their assumptions about learning are problematic and limiting in a number of respects, privileging human consciousness and intention, and literally ‘making’ a particular professional subject that is atomised and conservative. The essay goes on to suggest alternative perspectives that are receiving increasing attention in theorising work-related learning and that may offer fruitful questions for re-considering the nature of professional learning and its assessment. Three perspectives in particular are outlined, all of which shift the focus from the learning subject to practice as material, emergent and systemic: complexity theory, actor-network theory and cultural-historical activity theory. The discussion concludes with possible approaches to assessment of professional practice suggested by these perspectives.
DOI Link: 10.1080/01580370903271446
Rights: Published in Studies in Continuing Education by Taylor & Francis (Routledge).; This is an electronic version of an article published in Studies in Continuing Education, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp. 229 - 244. Studies in Continuing Education is available online at:

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SCE-making to measure.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version176.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.