Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35834
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRing, Nicola Aen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcHugh, Nessa Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorReed, Bethany Ben_UK
dc.contributor.authorDavidson-Welch, Rachelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDodd, Leslieen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-07T01:08:10Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-07T01:08:10Z-
dc.date.issued2024-02en_UK
dc.identifier.other106026en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/35834-
dc.description.abstractBackground Nearly 4000 people were accused of witchcraft in Scotland between 1563 and 1736. Some of these were healers, midwives, and nurses. Objective To investigate Scotland's folk-healers and midwives accused of witchcraft and review their work from a nursing and midwifery perspective. Design Secondary analysis of the Survey of Scottish Witchcraft. Methods Those on the Survey with witchcraft accusations relating to folk-healing or midwifery were identified and their biographies were created from Survey data (2021). Individual biographical data were descriptively analysed. Healing/midwifery practice information was tabulated and thematically analysed. Results 142 individuals were identified (85 % women), 51 % were found guilty, 90 % were executed. Most (98 %) were folk-healers with 10 accused for midwifery reasons. Mainly their work was accused of causing harm. Three themes emerged: their use of rituals; unorthodox religious practices and treatments. Rituals included actions carried out a certain number of times. Religious practices frequently referenced Catholicism. Many of their treatments for ingestion, application or bathing used items still recognised for their health properties. Approximately, 10 % of the 142, mainly in the 1500s/early 1600s, utilised expensive items and complex treatments which had more in common with ‘elite’ knowledge rather than simple folklore. Conclusions Across all 142 people, many aspects of their work are identifiable within more contemporary nursing and midwifery practice including their use of rituals, treatments, and holism. Mostly the accused were folk-practitioners, but a few (1500s/early 1600s) appear to have been healers working akin to physicians. Following the Protestant reformation (1560) their work, unlike that of physicians, was marginalised, considered unorthodox and harmful because they were women and/or their work reflected Catholicism. European hospital nursing originates in the monastic houses, but little is known about these early religious nurses. This study is novel in suggesting that whoever taught these accused witch/healers may have been connected to the monastic hospitals pre-Reformation.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_UK
dc.relationRing NA, McHugh NM, Reed BB, Davidson-Welch R & Dodd L (2024) Healers and midwives accused of witchcraft (1563–1736) - What secondary analysis of the Scottish survey of witchcraft can contribute to the teaching of nursing and midwifery history. <i>Nurse Education Today</i>, 133, Art. No.: 106026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.106026en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You are not required to obtain permission to reuse this article. To request permission for a type of use not listed, please contact Elsevier Global Rights Department.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectNursingen_UK
dc.subjectMidwiferyen_UK
dc.subjectHistoryen_UK
dc.subjectFolk-healersen_UK
dc.subjectWitchesen_UK
dc.subjectRitualsen_UK
dc.subjectHolistic careen_UK
dc.subjectReligious nursesen_UK
dc.titleHealers and midwives accused of witchcraft (1563–1736) - What secondary analysis of the Scottish survey of witchcraft can contribute to the teaching of nursing and midwifery historyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.nedt.2023.106026en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid38029694en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleNurse Education Todayen_UK
dc.citation.issn1532-2793en_UK
dc.citation.issn0260-6917en_UK
dc.citation.volume133en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderRéseau de cancérologie Rossyen_UK
dc.author.emailleslie.dodd@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date07/11/2023en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEdinburgh Napier Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEdinburgh Napier Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationIndependenten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEdinburgh Napier Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLawen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85178380309en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1982190en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6367-7316en_UK
dc.date.accepted2023-11-02en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-11-02en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2024-02-16en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorRing, Nicola A|0000-0001-6367-7316en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcHugh, Nessa M|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorReed, Bethany B|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDavidson-Welch, Rachel|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDodd, Leslie|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Réseau de cancérologie Rossy|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2024-02-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2024-02-29|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1-s2.0-S0260691723003209-main.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1532-2793en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0260691723003209-main.pdfFulltext - Published Version498.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.