Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35831
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAyers, Susanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSinesi, Andreaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCoates, Roseen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCheyne, Helenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMaxwell, Margareten_UK
dc.contributor.authorBest, Cathen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcNicol, Staceyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Louise Ren_UK
dc.contributor.authorUddin, Nazihahen_UK
dc.contributor.authorShakespeare, Judyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAlderdice, Fionaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-07T01:07:18Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-07T01:07:18Z-
dc.date.issued2024-04en_UK
dc.identifier.other102841en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/35831-
dc.description.abstractBackground: For screening for anxiety during pregnancy and after birth to be efficient and effective it is important to know the optimal time to screen in order to identify women who might benefit from treatment. Aims: To determine the optimal time to screen for perinatal anxiety to identify women with anxiety disorders and those who want treatment. A secondary aim was to examine the stability and course of perinatal anxiety over time. Methods: Prospective longitudinal cohort study of 2243 women who completed five screening questionnaires of anxiety and mental health symptoms in early pregnancy (11 weeks), mid-pregnancy (23 weeks), late pregnancy (32 weeks) and postnatally (8 weeks). Anxiety and mental health questionnaires were the GAD7, GAD2, SAAS, CORE-10 and Whooley questions. To establish presence of anxiety disorders diagnostic interviews were con ducted with a subsample of 403 participants. Results: Early pregnancy was the optimal time to screen for anxiety to identify women with anxiety disorders and women wanting treatment at any time during pregnancy or postnatally. These findings were consistent across all five questionnaires of anxiety and mental health. Receiving treatment for perinatal mental health problems was most strongly associated with late pregnancy and/or postnatal assessments. Anxiety symptoms were highest in early pregnancy and decreased over time. Conclusion: Findings show that screening in early pregnancy is optimal for identifying women who have, or develop, anxiety disorders and who want treatment. This has clear implications for practice and policy for anxiety screening during the perinatal period.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationAyers S, Sinesi A, Coates R, Cheyne H, Maxwell M, Best C, McNicol S, Williams LR, Uddin N, Shakespeare J & Alderdice F (2024) When is the best time to screen for perinatal anxiety? A longitudinal cohort study. <i>Journal of Anxiety Disorders</i>, 103, Art. No.: 102841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102841en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You are not required to obtain permission to reuse this article. To request permission for a type of use not listed, please contact Elsevier Global Rights Department.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectAnxietyen_UK
dc.subjectScreeningen_UK
dc.subjectPregnancyen_UK
dc.subjectPostpartumen_UK
dc.subjectAssessmenten_UK
dc.titleWhen is the best time to screen for perinatal anxiety? A longitudinal cohort studyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102841en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid38367480en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Anxiety Disordersen_UK
dc.citation.issn1873-7897en_UK
dc.citation.issn0887-6185en_UK
dc.citation.volume103en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNIHR National Institute for Health Researchen_UK
dc.author.emailcatherine.best2@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date06/02/2024en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationIndependenten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Oxforden_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85185493024en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1976442en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5738-8390en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-3318-9500en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3652-2498en_UK
dc.date.accepted2024-01-29en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-01-29en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2024-02-19en_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectMethods of assessing perinatal anxiety: The acceptability, effectiveness and feasibility of different approachesen_UK
dc.relation.funderref17/105/16en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorAyers, Susan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSinesi, Andrea|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCoates, Rose|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCheyne, Helen|0000-0001-5738-8390en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMaxwell, Margaret|0000-0003-3318-9500en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBest, Cath|0000-0002-3652-2498en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcNicol, Stacey|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWilliams, Louise R|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorUddin, Nazihah|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorShakespeare, Judy|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAlderdice, Fiona|en_UK
local.rioxx.project17/105/16|National Institute for Health Research|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2024-02-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2024-02-29|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1-s2.0-S0887618524000173-main.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1873-7897en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0887618524000173-main.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.29 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.