Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35419
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorNeely, Sarah-
dc.contributor.advisorBirrell, Ross-
dc.contributor.authorMain, Shona-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-27T08:52:50Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01-06-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/35419-
dc.description.abstractJenny Gilbertson, an independent self-funded filmmaker, lived and filmed Shetland communities in the 1930s, then, after a teaching career, Inuit communities in Arctic Canada from 1970–1978. Keen to develop a practice that resists the extractive nature of documentary production and a determination to foreground Gilbertson as an ethical filmmaker, in this thesis, I ask what can contemporary filmmakers learn from her way of living with and filming an Indigenous community? Ethical debate in documentary filmmaking is largely dominated by the protection of the filmmaker’s property (the film) through copyright, consent and freedom of expression. Yet this strengthening of ownership cannot deny the very nature of documentary, which is extractive and assimilatory. Gilbertson’s approach was quietly different: shaped by the valuing of friendship, community and reciprocity, it resulted in a portrayal of Inuit by a qallunaaq (white person) that was unlike any other at that time. Using the three experiential events of archival research (including close readings of Gilbertson’s diaries, her last film, Jenny’s Arctic diary (1978) filmed in Grise Fiord and her newly digitised Arctic Sound Recordings from 1970–1978); fieldwork (filming and interviews carried out in Grise Fiord in 2018); and the editing process, I used my buddhist practice and theory as liberatory practice to deepen and develop the ethics – thinking and caring – in my filmmaking practice. Recognising the 40 years of political and cultural change between Gilbertson and myself, I consider the daily business of documenting people and place and how in thinking and caring about those you film, you confront and negotiate desire, responsibility and possibility, all within the context of a relationship, a project, an industry, a technology, a budget, and, significantly, the history of the other. My written thesis draws on these confrontations and negotiations to examine Iris Murdoch and Simone Weil’s theories of attention and Pauline Oliveros, Dylan Robinson and Salomé Voegelin’s approaches to listening and sounding, I consider both Gilbertson’s and my own attempts to resist ‘taking’ from and ‘using’ the people we filmed and recorded and where this sits alongside our shared overriding desire to make community and kin. The outcome of this liberatory theory on my practice research is a 75-minute film in which I go ‘with’ Gilbertson to Grise Fiord. In this I learn about her time there, the people and things she looked at, listened to and spent time with. Using this time between Gilbertson and myself, I present a visual and sonic reflection of Gilbertson’s practice through my own and reveal the ways in which attending, listening and putting the filmed before the film can generate ethical possibilities that interrupt the norms of documentary filmmaking.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Stirlingen_GB
dc.rights© Shona Mainen_GB
dc.subjectfilmmaking practiceen_GB
dc.subjectethicsen_GB
dc.subjectattentionen_GB
dc.subjectcritical listening positionalityen_GB
dc.subjectcommunityen_GB
dc.subjectstop colonisingen_GB
dc.subject.lcshGilbertson, Jenny, 1902-1990en_GB
dc.subject.lcshDocumentary filmsen_GB
dc.subject.lcshEthicsen_GB
dc.subject.lcshMotion pictures Great Britain History.en_GB
dc.subject.lcshMotion picture authorship Moral and ethical aspectsen_GB
dc.subject.lcshMotion pictures Production and directionen_GB
dc.titleAttending, listening, taking time: the quietly radical ethical practice of the filmmaker Jenny Gilbertsonen_GB
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctor of Philosophyen_GB
dc.rights.embargodate2025-01-06-
dc.rights.embargoreasonI would like to take this thesis and film back to the community I filmed in Grise Fiord, Nunavut to seek their informed consent before it is made available to the public. It is important, ethically and personally, that they have a genuine opportunity to read/watch, think and speak about it (including amongst themselves) and for me to sincerely respond and re-edit the film if need be. My examiners fully understood this need. I am in touch with the community in Grise Fiord and will return as soon as I am able. At the request of the author the thesis has been embargoed for a number of months with an authorised exception to the UKRI required 12 month maximum. UKRI have agreed that, at the discretion of the University, authors can request short extensions beyond the prescribed 12 months.en_GB
dc.contributor.funderSGSAHen_GB
dc.author.emailshonamain@gmail.comen_GB
dc.rights.embargoterms2025-01-07en_GB
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2025-01-07-
Appears in Collections:Communications, Media and Culture eTheses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Main Shona PhD Thesis Sept 2023.pdfThesis1.7 MBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2025-01-07    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.