Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Youth co-authorship as public engagement with geoengineering
Author(s): Dunlop, Lynda
Rushton, Elizabeth
Atkinson, Lucy
Cornelissen, Eef
De Schrijver, Jelle
Stadnyk, Tetiana
Stubbs, Joshua
Su, Chrissy
Turkenburg-van Diepen, Maria
Veneu, Fernanda
Blake, Celena
Calvert, Saul
Dècle, Clémentine
Dhassi, Kirndeep
Edwards, Rosalind
Malaj, Greta
Mirjanić, Jovana
Saunders, William
Sinkovec, Yara
Vellekoop, Suzan
Yuan, Xinyue
Contact Email:
Keywords: Communication
Issue Date: 2-Jan-2022
Date Deposited: 11-Aug-2023
Citation: Dunlop L, Rushton E, Atkinson L, Cornelissen E, De Schrijver J, Stadnyk T, Stubbs J, Su C, Turkenburg-van Diepen M, Veneu F, Blake C, Calvert S, Dècle C, Dhassi K, Edwards R, Malaj G, Mirjanić J, Saunders W, Sinkovec Y, Vellekoop S & Yuan X (2022) Youth co-authorship as public engagement with geoengineering. <i>International Journal of Science Education, Part B</i>, 12 (1), pp. 60-74.
Abstract: Large-scale intervention in the Earth’s climate system is increasingly present in discussions about possible responses to climate change. Young people’s perspectives have tended to be under-represented despite the intergenerational consequences of policy in this field. We report on a novel approach to research and practice: the co-creation of a youth guide and policy brief by youth participants and facilitators. The model offers potential use by practitioners for engaging publics at the early stages of technoscientific innovations. Findings fall into two categories: youth priorities for geoengineering and authorial responsibility as a way of supporting youth action. Tentative conclusions from youth participants are (i) action must be prioritised now to mitigate and adapt to climate change, rather than continuing with ‘business as usual’; and (ii) there is a need for proactive international cooperation on governance and research on geoengineering to understand potential environmental and social consequences of geoengineering proposals for people at different temporal and spatial scales. Greater public dialogue on geoengineering and its governance is needed, particularly involving young people. The youth guide and policy brief co-authored by participants and facilitators, and the dialogic methods used in their production, can contribute to this dialogue.
DOI Link: 10.1080/21548455.2022.2027043
Rights: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Licence URL(s):

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
geoengineering_IJSEpartB.pdfFulltext - Published Version2.32 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.