Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35320
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSerpa, Regina C.en_UK
dc.contributor.authorRolfe, Steveen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGibson, Granten_UK
dc.contributor.authorLawrence, Juliaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcCall, Vikkien_UK
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-24T00:30:55Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-24T00:30:55Z-
dc.date.issued2023-04-19en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/35320-
dc.description.abstractSince at least 2012, UK housing providers (and policy makers) have introduced policies aimed at developing autonomy and independence among service users, through an agenda sometimes referred to as ‘responsibilisation’. This paper considers the role that technologies play in this agenda, through an analysis of how wellbeing and independence are facilitated amongst older social housing tenants. Based on case studies of four supported housing schemes in England, the research considers the capacity to exercise agency amongst older persons, through their willingness and ability to accept technological interventions, and the role of support networks to facilitate independent living. Using the concept of modalities of agency, the research examines the impact of implementing ‘low-level’ assistive technologies in the home, based on the perspectives of residents and staff. The interventions studied were designed to improve social relationships, promote self-sufficiency and support self-managed care (based on the principle that the most effective projects facilitate individual agency). The research findings identified that residents responded differentially to technology, based on their levels of capability, motivation, reluctance and resistance. Whilst the study demonstrated that small technological innovations could have disproportionately positive impacts in improving wellbeing, the research demonstrates the complex nature of agency and limits of responsibility. The paper argues that responsibilisation is part of a wider neoliberal project, where choice and agency are manufactured to create an idealised notion of the autonomous actor (in this case through technology-enabled care). The article argues that a collaborative approach to service provision in which responsibility is shared, via co-managed care, is a more effective means of enhancing agency, than one which advocates a withdrawal of support (in the guise of autonomy).en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_UK
dc.relationSerpa RC, Rolfe S, Gibson G, Lawrence J & McCall V (2023) Agency and the Limits of Responsibility: Co-Management of Technology-Enabled Care in Supported Housing. <i>Social Sciences</i>, 12 (4). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12040248en_UK
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjecttechnology-enabled careen_UK
dc.subjectco-managementen_UK
dc.subjectageingen_UK
dc.subjectsupported housingen_UK
dc.subjectresponsibilisationen_UK
dc.titleAgency and the Limits of Responsibility: Co-Management of Technology-Enabled Care in Supported Housingen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/socsci12040248en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleSocial Sciencesen_UK
dc.citation.issn2076-0760en_UK
dc.citation.volume12en_UK
dc.citation.issue4en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailr.c.serpa@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date19/04/2023en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSociology, Social Policy & Criminologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSociology, Social Policy & Criminologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationDementia and Ageingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Social Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHousing Studiesen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1918799en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-4191-7205en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1465-7401en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8249-4697en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7989-9570en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4105-406Xen_UK
dc.date.accepted2023-04-17en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-04-17en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2023-07-20en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorSerpa, Regina C.|0000-0003-4191-7205en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRolfe, Steve|0000-0003-1465-7401en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGibson, Grant|0000-0001-8249-4697en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLawrence, Julia|0000-0001-7989-9570en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcCall, Vikki|0000-0002-4105-406Xen_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2023-07-20en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2023-07-20|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamesocsci-12-00248.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
socsci-12-00248.pdfFulltext - Published Version458.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.