Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35302
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMaxwell, Margareten_UK
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Chris Fen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Brianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDougall, Nadineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorStephen MacGillivray, Stephenen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-24T00:24:32Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-24T00:24:32Z-
dc.date.issued2022-12en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/35302-
dc.description.abstractObjective To assess and clarify the relations between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) dose efficacy, acceptability (early treatment discontinuation (dropouts)), and tolerability (reported adverse drug effects), and critically evaluate methods previously used to examine SSRI dose-response effects for the treatment of depression in adults. Design Systematic review of reviews and meta-narrative synthesis. Data sources Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus, and the Cochrane Collaboration library, from 1975 to December 2021. Reference lists of national depression treatment guidelines were systemically searched by hand. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Reviews assessing SSRI monotherapy dose-response effects for the treatment of depression in adults (age ≥18 years) reporting efficacy, acceptability, or tolerability. Reviews meeting inclusion criteria had a high degree of heterogeneity, due to methodological diversity; therefore, a meta-narrative synthesis approach was applied. Standard daily doses were defined as 20 mg citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine; 50 mg sertraline; and 10 mg escitalopram. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews tool, in line with Cochrane recommendations. Results The search identified 9138 records; 387 full text reports were assessed for eligibility, 42 of which matched the inclusion criteria. The majority, 83% (n=35), of reviews included data for studies with a duration of ≤12 weeks (ie, the acute phase of depression treatment). Of 39 reviews assessing efficacy, the majority (n=26) indicated that individual SSRIs and SSRI class demonstrated flat dose-response effects; standard doses were optimal for efficacy. Acceptability or tolerability were assessed in 28 reviews. Higher than standard daily doses were associated with higher dropout rates and a greater incidence of adverse drug effects (eg, nausea, sexual dysfunction, fatigue, anxiety). Despite a range of methods being reported, there was an overall consensus regarding SSRI dose related efficacy, dropouts, and adverse drug effects. Conclusion Standard daily doses of SSRIs for the treatment of depression in adults provide a favourable balance between efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability. Patients are encouraged to talk to their prescriber or community pharmacist if they experience adverse effects or have any concerns about their drug treatments.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMJen_UK
dc.relationMaxwell M, Johnson CF, Williams B, Dougall N & Stephen MacGillivray S (2022) Dose-response effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor monotherapy for the treatment of depression: systematic review of reviews and meta-narrative synthesis. <i>BMJ Medicine</i>, 1 (1), p. e000017. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2021-000017en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/ 4.0/.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_UK
dc.titleDose-response effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor monotherapy for the treatment of depression: systematic review of reviews and meta-narrative synthesisen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjmed-2021-000017en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid36936596en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMJ Medicineen_UK
dc.citation.issn2754-0413en_UK
dc.citation.issn2754-0413en_UK
dc.citation.volume1en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spagee000017en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNHS Greater Glasgow & Clydeen_UK
dc.author.emailmargaret.maxwell@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date02/12/2022en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Greater Glasgow & Clydeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEdinburgh Napier Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEdinburgh Napier Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1922872en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-3318-9500en_UK
dc.date.accepted2022-10-05en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-10-05en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2023-08-01en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMaxwell, Margaret|0000-0003-3318-9500en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJohnson, Chris F|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWilliams, Brian|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDougall, Nadine|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorStephen MacGillivray, Stephen|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2023-08-16en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/|2023-08-16|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamebmjmed Johnson et al 2022.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2754-0413en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
bmjmed Johnson et al 2022.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.