Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35295
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Dumbrell, Josh | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Daneshvar, Hadi | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Oteo, Alberto | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Baldacchino, Alexander | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Matheson, Catriona | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-24T00:22:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-24T00:22:06Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-03-26 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.other | 40 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35295 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background Opioids were implicated in approximately 88,000 fatal overdoses (OD) globally. However, in principle all opioid OD are reversible with the timely administration of naloxone hydrochloride. Despite the widespread availability of naloxone among people who use opioids (PWUO), many who suffer fatal OD use alone, without others present to administer the reversal agent. Recognising this key aspect of the challenge calls for innovations, a number of technological approaches have emerged which aim to connect OD victims with naloxone. However, the acceptability of OD response technologies to PWUO is of key concern. Methods Drawing on the Technology People Organisations Macroenvironment (TPOM) framework, this study sought to integrate acceptability-related findings in this space with primary research data from PWUO, affected family members and service providers to understand the factors involved in harm reduction technology acceptability. A qualitative study using a focus group methodology was conducted. The participant groups were people with lived experience of problem opioid use, affected family members and service providers. Data analysis followed a multi-stage approach to thematic analysis and utilised both inductive and deductive methods. Results Thirty individuals participated in one of six focus groups between November 2021 and September 2022. The analysis generated six major themes, three of which are reported in this article—selected for their close relevance to PWUO and their importance to developers of digital technologies for this group. ‘Trust—in technologies, systems and people’ was a major theme and was closely linked to data security, privacy and confidentiality. ‘Balancing harm reduction, safety and ambivalence’ reflects the delicate balance technological solutions must achieve to be acceptable to PWUO. Lastly, ‘readiness—a double bind’ encapsulates the perception shared across participant groups, that those at the highest risk, may be the least able to engage with interventions. Conclusion Effective digital strategies to prevent fatal OD must be sensitive to the complex relationships between technological, social/human, organisational and wider macroenvironmental factors which can enable or impede intervention delivery. Trust, readiness and performance are central to technology acceptability for PWUO. An augmented TPOM was developed (the TPOM-ODART). | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC | en_UK |
dc.relation | Dumbrell J, Daneshvar H, Oteo A, Baldacchino A & Matheson C (2023) The acceptability of overdose alert and response technologies: introducing the TPOM-ODART framework. <i>Harm Reduction Journal</i>, 20, Art. No.: 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-023-00763-4 | en_UK |
dc.rights | Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_UK |
dc.subject | Opioids | en_UK |
dc.subject | People who use opioids (PWUO) | en_UK |
dc.subject | Overdose (OD) | en_UK |
dc.subject | Public health | en_UK |
dc.subject | Harm reduction | en_UK |
dc.subject | Overdose alert and response technologies (ODART) | en_UK |
dc.subject | TPOM-ODART | en_UK |
dc.subject | Overdose digital technologies | en_UK |
dc.title | The acceptability of overdose alert and response technologies: introducing the TPOM-ODART framework | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12954-023-00763-4 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 36967388 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | Harm Reduction Journal | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1477-7517 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 20 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | VoR - Version of Record | en_UK |
dc.contributor.funder | Scottish Government | en_UK |
dc.author.email | hadi.daneshvar@stir.ac.uk | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 26/03/2023 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Dementia and Ageing | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Faculty of Social Sciences | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of St Andrews | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of St Andrews | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Faculty of Social Sciences | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000957037500001 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85151044888 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 1911456 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-03-03 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2023-03-03 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2023-06-20 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Dumbrell, Josh| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Daneshvar, Hadi| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Oteo, Alberto| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Baldacchino, Alexander| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Matheson, Catriona| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Project ID unknown|Scottish Government|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100012095 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2023-06-20 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2023-06-20| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | acceptablityofoverdose.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
acceptablityofoverdose.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 1.08 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.