Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35274
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDonaldson, Jayne-
dc.contributor.advisorBest, Catherine-
dc.contributor.authorToft, Katherine-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-11T15:42:37Z-
dc.date.issued2023-03-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/35274-
dc.description.abstractBackground Dysphagia, or difficulty swallowing, is a highly prevalent symptom of Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) and treatment, and has a marked impact on patients’ quality of life (QoL). Measurement of dysphagia-related QoL is therefore a key part of HNC clinical and research practice. Currently the only HNC-specific tool that caters to this need is the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). However, the MDADI is now more than 20 years old and has never undergone validation in the United Kingdom. Aim The aim of this study was to explore the psychometric properties and clinical utility of the MDADI. Methods This study followed a pragmatic, mixed methods approach to evaluate the MDADI, using the COSMIN methodology as a framework. Qualitative data from UK Speech & Language Therapists were gathered via an online survey, focussing on content validity and clinical utility of the MDADI, and analysed using a reflexive Thematic Analysis approach. Quantitative MDADI data from patients with HNC treated in NHS Lothian were used to analyse the MDADI’s structural validity and internal consistency, using Item Response Theory (IRT). Data generated by both arms of the study were then combined to explore the presence of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) in specific tool items, and to formulate suggestions for shortened versions of the tool. Results Analysis of the survey data uncovered issues with both the content validity and clinical utility of the MDADI. IRT analysis of tool structural validity and internal consistency showed these properties to be acceptable, however DIF analysis for the variables of age, sex and socioeconomic status indicated these variables all affected patient responses to specific MDADI items. Pre- and post-treatment versions of a shortened 5-item MDADI were generated, in addition to suggestions for future development of the MDADI tool.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Stirlingen_GB
dc.subjectdysphagiaen_GB
dc.subjecthead and neck canceren_GB
dc.subjectoutcome measurementen_GB
dc.subjectcontent validityen_GB
dc.subjectclinical utilityen_GB
dc.subjectitem response theoryen_GB
dc.subjectdifferential item functioningen_GB
dc.subjectspeech & language therapyen_GB
dc.subjectpatient reported outcome measuresen_GB
dc.subjectmixed methodsen_GB
dc.subjectqualitative researchen_GB
dc.subjectquantitative researchen_GB
dc.titleAnalysing and enhancing the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory: a mixed methods analysis of the head and neck cancer swallowing-related quality of life patient reported outcome toolen_GB
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnameProfessional Doctorateen_GB
dc.rights.embargodate2024-08-31-
dc.rights.embargoreasonTo allow time to write articles for publicationen_GB
dc.author.emailkat2@stir.ac.uken_GB
dc.rights.embargoterms2024-08-02en_GB
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2024-08-02-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport eTheses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Katherine Toft 2636551 Corrected Thesis submission FINAL.pdf5.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.