Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Your Body Is a Battleground: Pregnancy Discrimination and College Sports After 50 Years of Title IX David McArdle and Sylvia de Mars
Author(s): McArdle, David
de Mars, Sylvia
Keywords: discrimination
Title IX
college sports
content analysis
Issue Date: Feb-2023
Date Deposited: 27-Mar-2023
Citation: McArdle D & de Mars S (2023) Your Body Is a Battleground: Pregnancy Discrimination and College Sports After 50 Years of Title IX David McArdle and Sylvia de Mars. <i>Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport</i>, 33 (1), pp. 3-45.
Abstract: This article offers a new perspective on academic institutions' engagement with Title IX, notably its provisions on pregnant and parenting students, as laid down in Regulation 34 CFR 106.41 as amended (the Pregnancy Regulation), and the concomitant NCAA model policy on pregnant and parenting student-athletes. That new perspective is achieved through a systematic content analysis of institutional pregnancy statements in schools' online student-athlete handbooks (OSAHs). There are few, if any, other examples of OSAHs being subjected to this degree of scrutiny, so the authors introduce readers to the rich source of data that OSAHs offer, and provide guidance on their analysis and interpretation. In considering why so few institutions have a pregnancy statement in their OSAHs, and why hardly any of them reflect the NCAA's model to any meaningful extent, the authors contend that institutions made a deliberate policy choice that was in part facilitated by the Supreme Court's decision in Gebser v Lago Vista Independent School District 524 US 274 (1998). The issue of pregnancy discrimination thus reflects a recurring feature within college sports: a three-way struggle between legal norms, a regulator with extensive but still limited powers, and member institutions that possess varying degrees of influence. On this occasion, the struggle has resulted in a comparative handful of colleges exercising disproportionate power not only over those other stakeholders, but also over the student-athletes whose wellbeing should lie at the heart of the relationship between them.
DOI Link: 10.18060/22433
Rights: The publisher has granted permission for use of this work in this Repository. Published in Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport:
Licence URL(s):

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
02-McArdle-022123.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.24 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.