Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34880
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorHames, Scott-
dc.contributor.advisorLynch, Peter-
dc.contributor.advisorEgginton, Heidi-
dc.contributor.advisorMacGlone, Eilidh-
dc.contributor.authorAustin, Alice M-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-22T10:50:27Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-22T10:50:27Z-
dc.date.issued2021-12-31-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/34880-
dc.description.abstractThis thesis investigates the construction and negotiation of cultural memory within the national archive. Emerging under the same specific historical circumstances, the nation and the archive operate as two sides of the same coin. The nation provides the defining framing in which archives have traditionally been understood to function, and the archive serves as the prism through which the national past and national future can be viewed and ‘read’. Evolutions in archival theory in the last century have demonstrated that archives are socially and imaginatively constructed: like the nation, records do not possess a natural character or value, but are instead inscribed value through inclusion in the archive. Collecting for the nation is not, therefore, a process that requires the uncovering or identifying records with innate value, but constitutes a tacit commentary on the nation’s character and on how the nation’s past, present, and future is conceived. Using the 2014 Scottish Independence Referendum as a case study, I will examine how, as the key archival repository in the country, the National Library of Scotland conceived of the task of ‘collecting for the nation’ at a time when the very character of the nation was in question. I argue that the Referendum had a decidedly personal and archival character, but that an adherence to traditional archival principles in the management and presentation of material limits its representative capacity. I argue that embracing the narrative aspects of archival action would allow archivists to foreground the constructed nature of archival collections and invite greater deliberation on the ways in which the nation is represented.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Stirlingen_GB
dc.subjectnational identityen_GB
dc.subjectScotlanden_GB
dc.subjectarchiveen_GB
dc.subjectcultural heritageen_GB
dc.subjectScottish independenceen_GB
dc.subject.lcshReferendumen_GB
dc.subject.lcshReferendum Case studies.en_GB
dc.subject.lcshScotlanden_GB
dc.subject.lcshScotland Parliamenten_GB
dc.subject.lcshNationalism Scotlanden_GB
dc.subject.lcshCultural property Scotlanden_GB
dc.subject.lcshArchives Scotlanden_GB
dc.subject.lcshArchival materials Scotlanden_GB
dc.subject.lcshSelf-determination National Scotland Public opinionen_GB
dc.titleArchive and Narrative in the 2014 Scottish Independence Referendumen_GB
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctor of Philosophyen_GB
dc.contributor.funderArts and Humanities Research Council [Grant Reference: AH/R002738/1]en_GB
dc.author.emailalice.maud.doyle@gmail.comen_GB
Appears in Collections:Literature and Languages eTheses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
AustinAlice_ArchiveandNarrative.pdf3.24 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.