Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: O Tempora! O Mores! The Place of Boni Mores in Dignity Discourse
Author(s): Brown, Jonathan
Contact Email:
Issue Date: Jan-2020
Date Deposited: 12-Sep-2022
Citation: Brown J (2020) O Tempora! O Mores! The Place of Boni Mores in Dignity Discourse. <i>Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics</i>, 29 (1), pp. 144-155.
Abstract: In an earlier article, I had argued that Common lawyers and bioethicists may find the Romanistic notion of the actio iniuriarum, and the conception of ‘dignity’ which is central to this legal mechanism, instructive in complex medico-legal cases. Professor Foster wrote a critical response to that piece, however – in recognition of Foster’s own claim that ‘to give an account of rights and respect, one necessarily has to resort to the principles on which those ideas are based… one is likely to get more satisfactory answers if one starts from the parent principle, this article submits that – insofar as ‘dignity’ is employed in any meaningful sense in moral and ethical debate – the principles of this philosophical notion are ultimately derived from the historic operation of that principle within the specific sub-discipline of legal philosophy. As legal philosophy differs significantly between the Common and Civilian traditions, this article suggests that if ‘dignity’ is to be afforded any place of prominence as a moral guide, it follows that the scope of the legal conception of dignity – between legal traditions – ought to be examined in full. Given the recognised differences between the two major legal families, oxymoronic comparative legal scholarship must be regarded as a necessary part of this process. This article purports to act as a primer for Common lawyers who are unfamiliar with Romanistic concepts such as existimatio and dignitas, as well as acting as a more direct response to Foster’s own article.
DOI Link: 10.1017/S0963180119000872
Rights: This article has been published in a revised form in Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics This version is published under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND. No commercial re-distribution or re-use allowed. Derivative works cannot be distributed. © Cambridge University Press 2019.
Licence URL(s):

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Brown_CQHE_2019.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version475.01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.