Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Dignity, Body Parts and the Actio Iniuriarum - A Novel Solution to a Common (Law) Problem?
Author(s): Brown, Jonathan
Contact Email:
Issue Date: Jul-2019
Date Deposited: 12-Sep-2022
Citation: Brown J (2019) Dignity, Body Parts and the Actio Iniuriarum - A Novel Solution to a Common (Law) Problem?. <i>Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics</i>, 28 (3), pp. 522-533.
Abstract: In issue 4 of the 23rd volume of this journal, Charles Foster published a critical piece on the topic of "Dignity and the Ownership and Use of Body Parts", arguing that property-based models of the ownership of human body parts are as ubiquitous as they are inadequate. The notion of 'human dignity', Foster argues (therein and in some of his earlier work), serves as a better candidate than its competitors for the role of moral guide in disputes pertaining to body parts which have been severed from their original subject. This argument is posited notwithstanding the fact (that Foster himself recognizes) that dignity is often seen as a "hopelessly amorphous", "vacuous concept" which should be "discarded as a potential foundation for rights claims, unless and until its source, nature, relevance and meaning are determined". The present piece does not purport to definitively determine the source, nature, relevant and meaning of the broad concept of 'dignity' as it exists in legal or ethical thought. Rather, it sets out simply to illustrate that in the mixed legal systems of Scotland and South Africa, legal claims which are predicated on the occurrence of some infringement of human dignity have been raised (and have the potential to be raised), pressed, and ultimately vindicated by the courts in those jurisdictions.
DOI Link: 10.1017/S0963180119000446
Rights: This article has been published in a revised form in Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics This version is published under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND. No commercial re-distribution or re-use allowed. Derivative works cannot be1 distributed. © Cambridge University Press 2019.
Licence URL(s):

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Brown_CQHE_2019.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version516.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.