Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34686
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: The Mouse and the Snail: Reappraising the Significance of Donoghue v Stevenson Part IV - "Remoteness", not "Duty"
Author(s): Brown, Jonathan
Contact Email: jonathan.brown@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Donaghue vs Stevenson
Scots Law
delict
delictual liability
Issue Date: 2022
Date Deposited: 30-Aug-2022
Citation: Brown J (2022) The Mouse and the Snail: Reappraising the Significance of Donoghue v Stevenson Part IV - "Remoteness", not "Duty". <i>Scots Law Times</i>, 2022 (38).
Abstract: Final article in a four-part series. Argues that notwithstanding the fact that the case of Donoghue v Stevenson 1932 SC (HL) 71 is celebrated in Scotland, the 'duty of care' concept which it cemented in Scots law is in fact nugatory. Contends that the principle of 'remoteness of damages' - still used in practice today, with the law pertaining to such clarified by Simmons v British Steel Plc 2004 SC (HL) 94 - in fact serves to properly limit the actionability of claims for wrongfully caused loss. Suggests that reference to both the 'duty of care' principle and 'remoteness' principle results in a confusing and unnecessary duplication of conceptual effort, even in those cases in which Professor Wilson suggested that the 'duty' idea might be fruitfully employed. Concludes by suggesting that the Scots law of delict - more or less directly as a result of the decision in Donoghue - is in danger of fragmenting into an unstructured mass of 'deliticles' a la the Common law system and that such would be a regrettable (and indeed ironic) development.
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Scots Law Times following peer review. The definitive published version Brown J (2022) The mouse and the snail: reappraising the significance of Donoghue v Stevenson: Part 1 - a case worth celebrating? Scots Law Times, 2022 (38) is available online on Westlaw UK. Reuse is allowed under an unrestricted use licence (CC BY).
Notes: Output Status: Forthcoming
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The Mouse and the Snail Part 4.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version184.52 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2024-01-01    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.