Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34673
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Morris-Garner v One Step (Support) Ltd: Limiting the Scope of Gain-Based Damages
Author(s): Dodd, Leslie
Contact Email: leslie.dodd@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Law
History
Cultural Studies
Issue Date: May-2019
Date Deposited: 15-Nov-2022
Citation: Dodd L (2019) Morris-Garner v One Step (Support) Ltd: Limiting the Scope of Gain-Based Damages. <i>Edinburgh Law Review</i>, 23 (2), pp. 242-247. https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2019.0552
Abstract: It is rare even for a Supreme Court case to provide a judgment as consequential as Morris-Garner v One Step (Support) Ltd., finally bringing clarity to issues first raised by Wrotham Park in 1973, imposing much-needed structure on the nature and availability of negotiating damages for breach of contract, and confining Attorney General v Blake as a wholly distinct form of award.
DOI Link: 10.3366/elr.2019.0552
Rights: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Edinburgh University Press in Edinburgh Law Review. The Version of Record is available online at: http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/elr.2019.0552

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
morris-garner-v-one-step-limiting-the-scope-of-gain-based-damages.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version284.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.