Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34378
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Yu, Hong L | - |
dc.contributor.advisor | Egan, Mo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Abu Hazeem, Mohammad S | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-27T12:25:59Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-03-31 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34378 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study explores the challenges that undermine the use of mediation in Jordan, and the lessons that can be learnt from the English civil justice system. The main goals of this research are to fill in the gaps in the Jordanian literature regarding the use of mediation and, significantly, for Jordan to learn from English practices that would contribute to the uptake in the use of mediation. The study employs a qualitative approach in conducting semi-structured interviews with seventeen Jordanian judges with experience in court-based mediation, and a quantitative approach in disseminating a questionnaire to 99 lawyers to gain insight into their perspectives and experiences in engaging in the practice of court-based mediation. The findings of the empirical study identified several barriers to the use of mediation in Jordan that informed the comparative study with England, mainly the lack of a court duty or power to encourage the use of mediation, lack of statutory and professional duty upon lawyers to encourage their clients to attempt mediation before litigation, and the lack of mediation education, training and awareness among stakeholders (judges, lawyers and public). Furthermore, the study explores the concept of access to justice and mandatory mediation. The study concludes that these obstacles can, potentially, be overcome. This would involve a system based on the English experience of imposing a duty on the court to encourage the use of mediation, and vesting the court with the power to impose costs sanctions on parties for refusing to attempt mediation unreasonably. Lawyers and the parties involved would help the court to further the overriding objective of the CPR by engaging in mediation, and by increasing mediation education, training and awareness among stakeholders. Accordingly, the study presents a theoretical and practical framework to the further development of court-based mediation in Jordan. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | University of Stirling | en_GB |
dc.subject | mediation | en_GB |
dc.subject | Jordan | en_GB |
dc.subject | court-based mediation | en_GB |
dc.subject | England | en_GB |
dc.subject | access to justice | en_GB |
dc.subject | mandatory mediation | en_GB |
dc.subject | lawyers and mediation | en_GB |
dc.subject | judges and mediation | en_GB |
dc.subject | mediation education | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Justice, Administration of | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Justice, Administration of Jordan | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Justice, Administration of England | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Civil law | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Civil law Jordan | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Mediation | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Court administration Jordan | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Court administration England. | en_GB |
dc.title | Challenges Undermining the Use of Mediation in the Jordanian Civil Justice System: Lessons Learnt from England | en_GB |
dc.type | Thesis or Dissertation | en_GB |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en_GB |
dc.type.qualificationname | Doctor of Philosophy | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2025-05-26 | - |
dc.rights.embargoreason | I am requesting to embargo my thesis for two years. First, as part of my ethical approval, participants in my empirical research have until 31 January 2024 to request to have their data withdrawn for any reason. Second, I require time to write articles for publication based on my research. May 2024: author requested extension of an additional year for embargo | en_GB |
dc.author.email | mahhazeem@yahoo.com | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoterms | 2025-05-27 | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoliftdate | 2025-05-27 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Law and Philosophy eTheses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
M S Abu Hazeem.pdf | PhD Thesis | 3.34 MB | Adobe PDF | Under Embargo until 2025-05-27 Request a copy |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.