Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34360
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBirken, Maryen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWenborn, Jenniferen_UK
dc.contributor.authorConnell, Catrionaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-25T00:01:51Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-25T00:01:51Z-
dc.date.issued2022-10en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/34360-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction High-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions are essential for determining whether an intervention is effective. However, many RCTs that examine the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions for adults with mental health conditions or dementia have methodological limitations that reduce confidence in their results. We aimed to systematically review the quality of methods and outcome measures used in RCTs of occupational therapy interventions for adults with a mental health condition or dementia. This will inform future research in this area and enable practitioners to appraise the evidence when selecting interventions. Method We searched peer-reviewed English language publications from 2000 to 2021 in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ASSIA, CINAHL and e-thos, and hand-searched 12 journals. We included papers that met pre-specified inclusion criteria, appraised quality using a validated tool and extracted data. We conducted a narrative synthesis. Results Of thirty-three included papers, 26 reported full or pilot RCTs, two reported secondary analysis or secondary outcomes of included RCTs, three reported process evaluations and two reported economic evaluations. Methodological limitations were found in many studies and outcome measures varied in their psychometric quality. Conclusion High-quality RCTs of occupational therapy interventions are needed for adults with mental health conditions and dementia. Researchers should follow international guidelines for rigorously developing and evaluating interventions and reporting studies. Practitioners should critically apply RCT evidence when selecting occupational therapy interventions.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_UK
dc.relationBirken M, Wenborn J & Connell C (2022) Randomised controlled trials of occupational therapy interventions for adults with a mental health condition or dementia: A systematic review of study methods and outcome measurement. <i>British Journal of Occupational Therapy</i>, 85 (10), pp. 761-778. https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226221086206en_UK
dc.rightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectreviewen_UK
dc.subjectresearch methodsen_UK
dc.subjectdementiaen_UK
dc.subjectmental healthen_UK
dc.titleRandomised controlled trials of occupational therapy interventions for adults with a mental health condition or dementia: A systematic review of study methods and outcome measurementen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/03080226221086206en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBritish Journal of Occupational Therapyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1477-6006en_UK
dc.citation.issn0308-0226en_UK
dc.citation.volume85en_UK
dc.citation.issue10en_UK
dc.citation.spage761en_UK
dc.citation.epage778en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.citation.date26/04/2022en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Social Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000798841500001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85129869656en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1817138en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8828-2118en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7311-8972en_UK
dc.date.accepted2022-02-15en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-02-15en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2022-05-24en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBirken, Mary|0000-0001-8828-2118en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWenborn, Jennifer|0000-0001-7311-8972en_UK
local.rioxx.authorConnell, Catriona|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2022-05-24en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2022-05-24|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameBirken-etal-BJOT-2022.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1477-6006en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Birken-etal-BJOT-2022.pdfFulltext - Published Version484.43 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.