Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34360
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Birken, Mary | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Wenborn, Jennifer | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Connell, Catriona | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-25T00:01:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-05-25T00:01:51Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-10 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34360 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction High-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions are essential for determining whether an intervention is effective. However, many RCTs that examine the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions for adults with mental health conditions or dementia have methodological limitations that reduce confidence in their results. We aimed to systematically review the quality of methods and outcome measures used in RCTs of occupational therapy interventions for adults with a mental health condition or dementia. This will inform future research in this area and enable practitioners to appraise the evidence when selecting interventions. Method We searched peer-reviewed English language publications from 2000 to 2021 in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ASSIA, CINAHL and e-thos, and hand-searched 12 journals. We included papers that met pre-specified inclusion criteria, appraised quality using a validated tool and extracted data. We conducted a narrative synthesis. Results Of thirty-three included papers, 26 reported full or pilot RCTs, two reported secondary analysis or secondary outcomes of included RCTs, three reported process evaluations and two reported economic evaluations. Methodological limitations were found in many studies and outcome measures varied in their psychometric quality. Conclusion High-quality RCTs of occupational therapy interventions are needed for adults with mental health conditions and dementia. Researchers should follow international guidelines for rigorously developing and evaluating interventions and reporting studies. Practitioners should critically apply RCT evidence when selecting occupational therapy interventions. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | SAGE Publications | en_UK |
dc.relation | Birken M, Wenborn J & Connell C (2022) Randomised controlled trials of occupational therapy interventions for adults with a mental health condition or dementia: A systematic review of study methods and outcome measurement. <i>British Journal of Occupational Therapy</i>, 85 (10), pp. 761-778. https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226221086206 | en_UK |
dc.rights | This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_UK |
dc.subject | review | en_UK |
dc.subject | research methods | en_UK |
dc.subject | dementia | en_UK |
dc.subject | mental health | en_UK |
dc.title | Randomised controlled trials of occupational therapy interventions for adults with a mental health condition or dementia: A systematic review of study methods and outcome measurement | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/03080226221086206 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | British Journal of Occupational Therapy | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1477-6006 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 0308-0226 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 85 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 10 | en_UK |
dc.citation.spage | 761 | en_UK |
dc.citation.epage | 778 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | VoR - Version of Record | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 26/04/2022 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University College London | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University College London | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Faculty of Social Sciences | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000798841500001 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85129869656 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 1817138 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0001-8828-2118 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0001-7311-8972 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2022-02-15 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2022-02-15 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2022-05-24 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not required | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Birken, Mary|0000-0001-8828-2118 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Wenborn, Jennifer|0000-0001-7311-8972 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Connell, Catriona| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Internal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2022-05-24 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2022-05-24| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | Birken-etal-BJOT-2022.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 1477-6006 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Birken-etal-BJOT-2022.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 484.43 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.