Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34328
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHajek, Peteren_UK
dc.contributor.authorPrzulj, Dunjaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPesola, Francescaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGriffiths, Chrisen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWalton, Roberten_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcRobbie, Haydenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorColeman, Timen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Sarahen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWhitemore, Rachelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorClark, Mirandaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorUssher, Michaelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSinclair, Lesleyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSeager, Emilyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Sueen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBauld, Lindaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-19T00:01:03Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-19T00:01:03Z-
dc.date.issued2022-05en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/34328-
dc.description.abstractNicotine replacement therapy, in the form of nicotine patches, is commonly offered to pregnant women who smoke to help them to stop smoking, but this approach has limited efficacy in this population. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are also used by pregnant women who smoke but their safety and efficacy in pregnancy are unknown. Here, we report the results of a randomized controlled trial in 1,140 participants comparing refillable e-cigarettes with nicotine patches. Pregnant women who smoked were randomized to e-cigarettes (n = 569) or nicotine patches (n = 571). In the unadjusted analysis of the primary outcome, validated prolonged quit rates at the end of pregnancy in the two study arms were not significantly different (6.8% versus 4.4% in the e-cigarette and patch arms, respectively; relative risk (RR) = 1.55, 95%CI: 0.95–2.53, P = 0.08). However, some participants in the nicotine patch group also used e-cigarettes during the study. In a pre-specified sensitivity analysis excluding abstinent participants who used non-allocated products, e-cigarettes were more effective than patches (6.8% versus 3.6%; RR = 1.93, 95%CI: 1.14–3.26, P = 0.02). Safety outcomes included adverse events and maternal and birth outcomes. The safety profile was found to be similar for both study products, however, low birthweight (en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_UK
dc.relationHajek P, Przulj D, Pesola F, Griffiths C, Walton R, McRobbie H, Coleman T, Lewis S, Whitemore R, Clark M, Ussher M, Sinclair L, Seager E, Cooper S & Bauld L (2022) Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine patches for smoking cessation in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Nature Medicine, 28 (5), pp. 958-964. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01808-0en_UK
dc.rightsThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectDiseasesen_UK
dc.subjectMedical researchen_UK
dc.titleElectronic cigarettes versus nicotine patches for smoking cessation in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trialen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41591-022-01808-0en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid35577966en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleNature Medicineen_UK
dc.citation.issn1546-170Xen_UK
dc.citation.issn1078-8956en_UK
dc.citation.volume28en_UK
dc.citation.issue5en_UK
dc.citation.spage958en_UK
dc.citation.epage964en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNational Institute for Health Researchen_UK
dc.citation.date16/05/2022en_UK
dc.description.notesAdditional co-authors: Felix Naughton, Peter Sasieni, Isaac Manyonda & Katie Myers Smithen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationQueen Mary, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationQueen Mary, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationQueen Mary, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationQueen Mary, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationQueen Mary, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of New South Walesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationQueen Mary, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000796324500002en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1815846en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9160-4296en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1133-8835en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-2054-7930en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7935-8694en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7777-1845en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7303-4805en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5308-6619en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6179-046Xen_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0995-7955en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-2210-8181en_UK
dc.date.accepted2022-03-31en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-03-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2022-05-18en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorHajek, Peter|0000-0001-9160-4296en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPrzulj, Dunja|0000-0003-1133-8835en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPesola, Francesca|0000-0002-2054-7930en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGriffiths, Chris|0000-0001-7935-8694en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWalton, Robert|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcRobbie, Hayden|0000-0002-7777-1845en_UK
local.rioxx.authorColeman, Tim|0000-0002-7303-4805en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLewis, Sarah|0000-0001-5308-6619en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWhitemore, Rachel|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorClark, Miranda|0000-0002-6179-046Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorUssher, Michael|0000-0002-0995-7955en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSinclair, Lesley|0000-0002-2210-8181en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSeager, Emily|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCooper, Sue|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBauld, Linda|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|National Institute for Health Research|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2022-05-18en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2022-05-18|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenames41591-022-01808-0.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1546-170Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s41591-022-01808-0.pdfFulltext - Published Version3.31 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.