Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33935
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRyde, Gemma Cen_UK
dc.contributor.authorTomaz, Simone Aen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSandison, Krissien_UK
dc.contributor.authorGreenwood, Carlen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Paulen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-08T01:03:10Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-08T01:03:10Z-
dc.date.issued2022-02en_UK
dc.identifier.other1843en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/33935-
dc.description.abstractWorkplace step count challenges show promise with regard to increasing physical activity, with walking linked to many positive physical and mental health benefits. Few studies have investigated their effects on work-related outcomes. The aim of this study was to describe (1) the process of collecting work-related outcomes as part of a real-world workplace intervention, the Step Count Challenge, and (2) report step counts and work-related outcomes (productivity, perceived stress and work engagement) during the Step Count Challenge. This pre-post study was conducted as part of a four-week 2018 National Step Count Challenge (SCC) in Scotland, UK. A survey was administered to collect self-reported steps, productivity (HWQ), perceived stress (Cohen Perceived Stress Scale) and work engagement (UWES) on the week prior to the intervention starting (baseline), week 1 and week 4. Process data such as recruitment and response rates were monitored throughout. Of 2042 employees who signed up to the SCC, baseline data were reported for 246 (12% of total; mean age 42.5 years, 83% female). Process data suggest low uptake to the study and poor compliance between surveys time points. Preliminary data suggest positive changes in step counts (3374 steps/day by week 4), stress and productivity. No changes in work engagement were found. The findings highlight the need to integrate research more effectively into real-world interventions, including a true baseline period. The Step Count Challenge may have positive change on some work-related outcomes warranting further investigation into how robust research designs can be delivered without negatively influencing real-world interventions.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_UK
dc.relationRyde GC, Tomaz SA, Sandison K, Greenwood C & Kelly P (2022) Measuring Productivity, Perceived Stress and Work Engagement of a Nationally Delivered Workplace Step Count Challenge. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (3), Art. No.: 1843. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031843en_UK
dc.rights© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectphysical activityen_UK
dc.subjectstepsen_UK
dc.subjectwalkingen_UK
dc.subjectworkplaceen_UK
dc.subjectstressen_UK
dc.subjectproductivityen_UK
dc.subjectwork engagementen_UK
dc.titleMeasuring Productivity, Perceived Stress and Work Engagement of a Nationally Delivered Workplace Step Count Challengeen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph19031843en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid35162865en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthen_UK
dc.citation.issn1660-4601en_UK
dc.citation.volume19en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.citation.date06/02/2022en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSporten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Shetlanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPaths for Allen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000755671900001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85123951713en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1793188en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9117-0803en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7531-3250en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1946-9848en_UK
dc.date.accepted2022-01-26en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-01-26en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2022-02-07en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorRyde, Gemma C|0000-0001-9117-0803en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTomaz, Simone A|0000-0002-7531-3250en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSandison, Krissi|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGreenwood, Carl|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKelly, Paul|0000-0003-1946-9848en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2022-02-07en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2022-02-07|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameijerph-19-01843-v2.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1660-4601en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ijerph-19-01843-v2.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.84 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.