Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33921
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRegauer, Markusen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMackay, Gordonen_UK
dc.contributor.authorNelson, Owenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBöcker, Wolfgangen_UK
dc.contributor.authorEhrnthaller, Christianen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-04T01:00:19Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-04T01:00:19Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01en_UK
dc.identifier.other331en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/33921-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Surgical treatment of unstable syndesmotic injuries is not trivial, and there are no generally accepted treatment guidelines. The most common controversies regarding surgical treatment are related to screw fixation versus dynamic fixation, the use of reduction clamps, open versus closed reduction, and the role of the posterior malleolus and of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL). Our aim was to draw important conclusions from the pertinent literature concerning surgical treatment of unstable syndesmotic injuries, to transform these conclusions into surgical principles supported by the literature, and finally to fuse these principles into an evidence-based surgical treatment algorithm. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the reference lists of systematic reviews of relevant studies dealing with the surgical treatment of unstable syndesmotic injuries were searched independently by two reviewers using specific terms and limits. Surgical principles supported by the literature were fused into an evidence-based surgical treatment algorithm. Results: A total of 171 articles were included for further considerations. Among them, 47 articles concerned syndesmotic screw fixation and 41 flexible dynamic fixations of the syndesmosis. Twenty-five studies compared screw fixation with dynamic fixations, and seven out of these comparisons were randomized controlled trials. Nineteen articles addressed the posterior malleolus, 14 the role of the AITFL, and eight the use of reduction clamps. Anatomic reduction is crucial to prevent posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Therefore, flexible dynamic stabilization techniques should be preferred whenever possible. An unstable AITFL should be repaired and augmented, as it represents an important stabilizer of external rotation of the distal fibula. Conclusions: The current literature provides sufficient arguments for the development of an evidence-based surgical treatment algorithm for unstable syndesmotic injuries.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherMDPIen_UK
dc.relationRegauer M, Mackay G, Nelson O, Böcker W & Ehrnthaller C (2022) Evidence-Based Surgical Treatment Algorithm for Unstable Syndesmotic Injuries. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11 (2), Art. No.: 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020331en_UK
dc.rights© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectsyndesmosisen_UK
dc.subjectanterior inferior tibiofibular ligamenten_UK
dc.subjecthigh ankle sprainen_UK
dc.subjectrotational instabilityen_UK
dc.subjectposterior malleolusen_UK
dc.subjectstabilizationen_UK
dc.subjectanatomic repairen_UK
dc.subjectsyndesmotic screwen_UK
dc.subjectsuture-buttonen_UK
dc.subjectinternal bracingen_UK
dc.subjecttreatment algorithmen_UK
dc.titleEvidence-Based Surgical Treatment Algorithm for Unstable Syndesmotic Injuriesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm11020331en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid35054025en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Clinical Medicineen_UK
dc.citation.issn2077-0383en_UK
dc.citation.volume11en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.citation.date10/01/2022en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Munichen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSporten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRoyal Hospitals, Belfasten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Munichen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Munichen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000747206200001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85122509405en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1791872en_UK
dc.date.accepted2022-01-05en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-01-05en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2022-02-03en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorRegauer, Markus|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMackay, Gordon|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorNelson, Owen|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBöcker, Wolfgang|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorEhrnthaller, Christian|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2022-02-03en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2022-02-03|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamejcm-11-00331-v2.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2077-0383en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
jcm-11-00331-v2.pdfFulltext - Published Version2.79 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.