Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33830
Appears in Collections: | History and Politics Book Chapters and Sections |
Title: | Mainstreaming the animal in biodiversity governance: Broadening the moral and legal community to nonhumans |
Author(s): | Schapper, Andrea Visseren-Hamakers, Ingrid Humphreys, David Bliss, Cebuan |
Contact Email: | andrea.schapper@stir.ac.uk |
Editor(s): | Kok, Marcel Visseren-Hamakers, Ingrid |
Citation: | Schapper A, Visseren-Hamakers I, Humphreys D & Bliss C (2022) Mainstreaming the animal in biodiversity governance: Broadening the moral and legal community to nonhumans. In: Kok M & Visseren-Hamakers I (eds.) Transforming Biodiversity Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179-199. https://www.cambridge.org/gb/academic/subjects/earth-and-environmental-science/environmental-policy-economics-and-law/transforming-biodiversity-governance?format=HB |
Keywords: | animal rights animal welfare Earth jurisprudence ecocentrism integrative governance rights of nature |
Issue Date: | 2022 |
Date Deposited: | 14-Jan-2022 |
Abstract: | This chapter argues that transformative biodiversity governance requires mainstreaming the interests of the individual animal. Applying an integrative governance perspective, we bring together debates from animal and biodiversity governance systems through a literature review and document analysis on animal rights and welfare, rights of nature (Earth jurisprudence), One Health and One Welfare, and compassionate conservation. We show, especially through rights-based approaches, that moral and legal communities are expanding beyond humans to include nature and non-human animals. Since Earth jurisprudence does not explicitly recognize the interests of the individual animal, and the animal rights discourse does not include flora or natural objects, both approaches are necessary to complete the shift from dominant anthropocentric ontologies to a more holistic and ecocentric approach that includes recognition of individual animals. Such a shift is vital to enact the transformative change required for a biodiversity governance model in which justice between species is integral. |
Rights: | This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This material has been accepted for publication in Transforming Biodiversity Governance edited by Marcel Kok and Ingrid Visseren-Hamakers. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution or re-use. © Cambridge University Press. |
URL: | https://www.cambridge.org/gb/academic/subjects/earth-and-environmental-science/environmental-policy-economics-and-law/transforming-biodiversity-governance?format=HB |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Schapper-etal-chapter-2022.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 490.93 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.