Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33806
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Annaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRoss, Jenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcKie, Janeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCollier, Amyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLockley, Paten_UK
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-11T01:00:58Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-11T01:00:58Z-
dc.date.issued2022en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/33806-
dc.description.abstractThis case study describes a project that combined speculative fiction and co-design as qualitative social science research methods. It also describes how planned methods had to be adapted from physically co-present to online implementation, and how we also had to change our expectations regarding the outcomes of the project. The combination of speculative fiction and co-design or co-creation offers a powerful way to enable participants to engage in public discussion of subjects or topics that they may be reluctant to talk about, perhaps because of complex loyalties, or perceptions of risk. Our study explored surveillance practices in Higher Education – that is, practices such as monitoring access to both virtual and physical learning spaces; online proctoring; the use of Learning Analytics; and the use of packages such as Office365, which allow for increasing surveillance of student and staff activities. However, similar methods could be used in other contexts where social and power dynamics might prevent explicit discussion of participants’ actual experiences. They are also effective in surfacing fears (and to some extent, hopes) about what has not yet happened, but might. The research was profoundly affected by the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, with planned physically co-present workshops coinciding with a period of strict national lockdown. This resulted in changes to both planned methods and expectations of what could be achieved during the funding period. This means that the case study also provides insights into how a research team can respond and pivot in relation to changed research context, including re-thinking both methods and goals without changing core aims. The case study also highlights how a shift to online data-sourcing can have unanticipated consequences, particularly in relation to anonymity and informed consenten_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_UK
dc.relationWilson A, Ross J, McKie J, Collier A & Lockley P (2022) Telling Data Stories: developing an online tool for participatory speculative fiction. SAGE. SAGE Research Methods: Doing Research Online. London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529603514en_UK
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSAGE Research Methods: Doing Research Onlineen_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher has not responded to our queries therefore this work cannot be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.titleTelling Data Stories: developing an online tool for participatory speculative fictionen_UK
dc.typeResearch Reporten_UK
dc.contributor.sponsorSAGEen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[WilsonAnna-SAGE-DRM-author-version.docx] The publisher has not responded to our queries. This work cannot be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.4135/9781529603514en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.author.emailanna.wilson@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.publisher.addressLondonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEducationen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationMiddlebury Collegeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationIndependenten_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1782569en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6928-1689en_UK
dc.date.accepted2021-12-16en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-12-16en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2021-12-17en_UK
dc.subject.tagQualitative Research Methodsen_UK
rioxxterms.typeTechnical Reporten_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorWilson, Anna|0000-0001-6928-1689en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoss, Jen|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcKie, Jane|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCollier, Amy|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLockley, Pat|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|University of Edinburgh|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000848en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2272-12-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameWilsonAnna-SAGE-DRM-author-version.docxen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Research Reports

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WilsonAnna-SAGE-DRM-author-version.docxFulltext - Accepted Version111.12 kBUnknownUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.