Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33571
Appears in Collections:Psychology Conference Papers and Proceedings
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Author(s): Tauber, Nina M
O'Toole, Mia S
Dinkel, Andreas
Galica, Jacqueline
Humphris, Gerry
Lebel, Sophie
Maheu, Christine
Ozakinci, Gozde
Prins, Judith
Sharpe, Louise
Smith, Allan "Ben"
Thewes, Belinda
Simard, Sebastien
Zachariae, Robert
Title: Effect of psychological intervention on fear of cancer recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Citation: Tauber NM, O'Toole MS, Dinkel A, Galica J, Humphris G, Lebel S, Maheu C, Ozakinci G, Prins J, Sharpe L, Smith A", Thewes B, Simard S & Zachariae R (2019) Effect of psychological intervention on fear of cancer recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 37 (31), pp. 2899-2915. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.00572
Issue Date: Nov-2019
Date Deposited: 5-Nov-2021
Abstract: PURPOSE Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a significantly distressing problem that affects a substantial number of patients with and survivors of cancer; however, the overall efficacy of available psychological interventions on FCR remains unknown. We therefore evaluated this in the present systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS We searched key electronic databases to identify trials that evaluated the effect of psychological interventions on FCR among patients with and survivors of cancer. Controlled trials were subjected to meta-analysis, and the moderating influence of study characteristics on the effect were examined. Overall quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system. Open trials were narratively reviewed to explore ongoing developments in the field (PROSPERO registration no.: CRD42017076514). RESULTS A total of 23 controlled trials (21 randomized controlled trials) and nine open trials were included. Small effects (Hedges’s g) were found both at postintervention (g = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.46; P < .001) and at follow-up (g = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.40; P < .001). Effects at postintervention of contemporary cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs; g = 0.42) were larger than those of traditional CBTs (g = 0.24; β = .22; 95% CI, .04 to .41; P = .018). At follow-up, larger effects were associated with shorter time to follow-up (β = −.01; 95% CI, −.01 to −.00; P = .027) and group-based formats (β = .18; 95% CI, .01 to .36; P = .041). A GRADE evaluation indicated evidence of moderate strength for effects of psychological intervention for FCR. CONCLUSION Psychological interventions for FCR revealed a small but robust effect at postintervention, which was largely maintained at follow-up. Larger postintervention effects were found for contemporary CBTs that were focused on processes of cognition—for example, worry, rumination, and attentional bias—rather than the content, and aimed to change the way in which the individual relates to his or her inner experiences. Future trials could investigate how to further optimize and tailor interventions to individual patients’ FCR presentation.
Status: VoR - Version of Record
Rights: Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
jco.19.00572.pdfFulltext - Published Version886.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.