Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33561
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStead, Martineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorJessop, Curtisen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAngus, Kathrynen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBedford, Helenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorUssher, Michaelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFord, Allisonen_UK
dc.contributor.authorEadie, Douglasen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMacGregor, Andyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHunt, Kateen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMacKintosh, Anne Marieen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-04T01:01:41Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-04T01:01:41Z-
dc.date.issued2021-10en_UK
dc.identifier.othere055085en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/33561-
dc.description.abstractObjectives To examine public views on COVID-19 vaccination and consider the implications for communications and targeted support. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Online and telephone nationally representative survey in Great Britain, January to February 2021. Participants 4978 adults. Survey response rate was 84%, among the 5931 panellists invited. Main outcome measures Sociodemographic characteristics (age, gender, ethnicity, education, financial status), COVID-19 status, vaccine acceptance, trust in COVID-19 vaccination information sources, perceptions of vaccination priority groups and perceptions of importance of second dose. Results COVID-19 vaccine acceptance (83%) was associated with increasing age, higher level of education and having been invited for vaccination. Acceptance decreased with unconfirmed past COVID-19, greater financial hardship and non-white British ethnicity; black/black British participants had lowest acceptance. Overall, healthcare and scientific sources of information were most trusted. Compared with white British participants, other ethnicities had lower trust in healthcare and scientific sources. Those with lower educational attainment or financial hardship had lower trust in healthcare and scientific sources. Those with no qualifications had higher trust in media and family/friends. While trust was low overall in community or faith leaders, it was higher among those with Asian/Asian British and black/black British ethnicity compared with white British participants. Views of vaccine prioritisation were mostly consistent with UK official policy but there was support for prioritising additional groups. There was high support for having the second vaccine dose. Conclusions Targeted engagement is needed to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in non-white British ethnic groups, in younger adults, and among those with lower education, greater financial hardship and unconfirmed past infection. Healthcare professionals and scientific advisors should play a central role in communications and tailored messaging is needed for hesitant groups. Careful communication around vaccination prioritisation continues to be required.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMJen_UK
dc.relationStead M, Jessop C, Angus K, Bedford H, Ussher M, Ford A, Eadie D, MacGregor A, Hunt K & MacKintosh AM (2021) National survey of attitudes towards and intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19: implications for communications. BMJ Open, 11 (10), Art. No.: e055085. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055085en_UK
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_UK
dc.subjectepidemiologyen_UK
dc.subjectimmunologyen_UK
dc.subjectpublic healthen_UK
dc.titleNational survey of attitudes towards and intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19: implications for communicationsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055085en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid34711602en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMJ Openen_UK
dc.citation.issn2044-6055en_UK
dc.citation.volume11en_UK
dc.citation.issue10en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderUKRI UK Research and Innovationen_UK
dc.citation.date28/10/2021en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNatCen Social Research (NatCen)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNatCen Social Research (NatCen)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000713199900017en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85118609440en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1769913en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3066-4604en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5351-4422en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0995-7955en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5873-3632en_UK
dc.date.accepted2021-10-05en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-10-05en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2021-11-03en_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectOptimising General Public Uptake of a Covid-19 Vaccine: A Mixed Methods Study (OPTIUMUM)en_UK
dc.relation.funderrefES/V012851/1en_UK
dc.subject.tagCOVID-19en_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorStead, Martine|0000-0002-3066-4604en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJessop, Curtis|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAngus, Kathryn|0000-0002-5351-4422en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBedford, Helen|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorUssher, Michael|0000-0002-0995-7955en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFord, Allison|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorEadie, Douglas|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMacGregor, Andy|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHunt, Kate|0000-0002-5873-3632en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMacKintosh, Anne Marie|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectES/V012851/1|UK Research and Innovation|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100014013en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2021-11-03en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2021-11-03|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamee055085.full.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2044-6055en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
e055085.full.pdfFulltext - Published Version352.03 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.