Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33560
Appears in Collections:History and Politics Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: The Co-operative Party and New Labour: a study of policy entrepreneur influence
Author(s): Kippin, Sean
Contact Email: sean.kippin@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Co-operative Party
Labour Party
Policy entrepreneurs
Multiple Streams Analysis
New Labour
Mutualism
Co-operative Schools
Issue Date: 29-Oct-2021
Date Deposited: 3-Nov-2021
Citation: Kippin S (2021) The Co-operative Party and New Labour: a study of policy entrepreneur influence. British Politics. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-021-00196-2
Abstract: The Co-operative Party, which represents the interests and ideas of the co-operative movement in British politics, has been the sister party of UK Labour since 1927. Largely ignored by scholarship, it has been on occasion the third-largest party grouping in the House of Commons and represents a social movement with formal members numbering in the millions. The unusual Labour/Co-operative relationship was tested during the New Labour period, with the Co-operative Party gradually establishing itself as a trusted sidekick and a source of policy ideas, despite some initial tensions. This article examines two historical instances where the party proved decisive in influencing public policy; the “Thomas Bill” in 2001–2002, and the creation of Co-operative Schools during the 2007–2010 Brown premiership. In each case, the activities of Co-operative Party-linked ‘policy entrepreneurs’ were key in the manufacture and exploitation of ‘windows of opportunity’ for policy change. The paper makes two core conclusions, one empirical: that the Co-operative Party was able to influence New Labour’s public policy direction in keeping with its founding objectives. The second is theoretical: that recent trends in Multiple Streams Analysis are reinforced, and that in smaller policy ‘subsystems’, skilled policy entrepreneurs can play a greater role in the creation of windows of opportunity for policy change than the original theory implies.
DOI Link: 10.1057/s41293-021-00196-2
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in British Politics. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-021-00196-2
Notes: Output Status: Forthcoming/Available Online
Licence URL(s): https://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdf

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
111021 Kippin revised.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version445.23 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2022-10-30    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.