Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:History and Politics Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Ontological (in)security and Covid-19: reimagining crisis leadership in UK higher education
Author(s): Wright, Katharine A M
Haastrup, Toni
Guerrina, Roberta
Issue Date: 2021
Date Deposited: 1-Nov-2021
Citation: Wright KAM, Haastrup T & Guerrina R (2021) Ontological (in)security and Covid-19: reimagining crisis leadership in UK higher education. Critical Studies on Security, 9 (2), pp. 174-178.
Abstract: First paragraph: The UK, at present, is characterised by a sense of ontological insecurity. Christopher S. Browning (2018) describes this type of insecurity as ‘fundamentally destabilising and challenging established worldviews, routines and core conceptions of selfhood’ (2018, 337). This is not a new phenomenon but one highlighted by years of multiple and intersecting crises, the most recent of which is the Covid-19 pandemic. The impact of these many crises is felt unevenly. The crises are themselves deeply gendered, racialised and classed, with a disproportionate impact on those living with disabilities and the elderly. As the latest crisis unfolded, a preoccupation with mortality rates fuelled a heightened and persistent state of anxiety, and raises questions about governance, leadership and security (Cuthbertson 2021). The UK government especially comes up short when contrasted with other states who have controlled the virus through effective leadership. Leadership practice is not ‘one size fits all’. As the management of the Covid-19 pandemic demonstrates, effective leadership is contextual and requires detailed understanding of socio-cultural factors but also attention needs to be given to the values expressed by the leaders. For instance, compassion and empathy have been key drivers for New Zealand, whereas transparency has underscored South Korea’s approach. What these cases have in common is an effective approach to crisis management that helped to contain the overall death toll.
DOI Link: 10.1080/21624887.2021.1978648
Rights: © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (, which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
Licence URL(s):

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wright-etal-CSS-2021.pdfFulltext - Published Version613.85 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.