Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33494
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMasterton, Wendyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPark, Kirstyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCarver, Hannahen_UK
dc.contributor.authorParkes, Tessaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-21T00:02:38Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-21T00:02:38Z-
dc.date.issued2021-11en_UK
dc.identifier.other102669en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/33494-
dc.description.abstractThe health benefits of greenspace are widely acknowledged. Greenspace programmes, defined as health programmes undertaken in outside green areas such as parks, gardens, hills, and forests, are becoming more commonplace. However, there is still limited understanding of the mechanisms by which greenspace programmes are effective. This makes future development and implementation very difficult. We recently developed and published a novel framework for greenspace programmes for mental health showing what works, for whom, and in what circumstances (Masterton et al., 2020). In this current study, the accuracy of the proposed framework was tested for the first time using primary data from greenspace organisations in Scotland. Given the link between mental health and substance use, the applicability of the framework to programmes that support people with problem substance use was also tested. A survey was designed to test the contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes identified within the previously proposed framework. The survey was completed by 64 participants to provide a general overview of the framework's applicability for programmes that support mental health, as well as for programmes that support people with problem substance use. Overall, respondents agreed with all survey statements. This suggests that the framework does effectively represent the underlying context, mechanism, outcome configurations of greenspace programmes for mental health. Furthermore, there were no differences between responses from organisations that support people with problem substance use, and organisations that do not support this client group. This shows that the framework has the potential to be applicable to both greenspace programmes for mental health and greenspace programmes for people with problem substance use. This is a novel finding as, to our knowledge, there is currently no framework looking to explain the contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes necessary for greenspace programmes to be successful for people with problem substance use.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_UK
dc.relationMasterton W, Park K, Carver H & Parkes T (2021) Greenspace programmes for mental health: A survey study to test what works, for whom, and in what circumstances. Health and Place, 72, Art. No.: 102669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102669en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You are not required to obtain permission to reuse this article.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectSubstance useen_UK
dc.subjectGreenspaceen_UK
dc.subjectIntervention developmenten_UK
dc.subjectMental healthen_UK
dc.titleGreenspace programmes for mental health: A survey study to test what works, for whom, and in what circumstancesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102669en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid34649209en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleHealth and Placeen_UK
dc.citation.issn1353-8292en_UK
dc.citation.volume72en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderEconomic and Social Research Councilen_UK
dc.citation.date11/10/2021en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Social Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSociology, Social Policy & Criminologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Social Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000710125600005en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85116771407en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1765353en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6080-7197en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6846-2661en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0409-3254en_UK
dc.date.accepted2021-09-06en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-09-06en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2021-10-20en_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMasterton, Wendy|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPark, Kirsty|0000-0001-6080-7197en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCarver, Hannah|0000-0002-6846-2661en_UK
local.rioxx.authorParkes, Tessa|0000-0002-0409-3254en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Economic and Social Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000269en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2021-10-20en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2021-10-20|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1-s2.0-S1353829221001659-main.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1353-8292en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S1353829221001659-main.pdfFulltext - Published Version3.64 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.