Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33354
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Maxwell, Margaret | - |
dc.contributor.advisor | Duncan, Edward | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gilmour, Lynne | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-27T12:28:21Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-04-30 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33354 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Suicide is the leading cause of death amongst children and young people in the UK. Children seeking help with suicidality are generally referred to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) for assessment and treatment. However, CAMHS across the UK are unable to meet the demand for their services. Little is known about how many children are referred for suicidality, or what happens to these children after they have been referred to CAMHS. This mixed methods thesis sought to explore the journey of care for children referred to CAMHS for suicidality; capturing how this is experienced by the children, alongside the views of their parents and CAMHS practitioners. It endeavoured to provide insight as to what the children, parents and practitioners would find helpful. The study comprised four main phases: 1. Literature reviews 2. A retrospective cohort study conducted in two different CAMHS in Scotland 3. A series of 27 qualitative interviews with children referred for suicidality, parents and practitioners working in CAMHS. 4. Overall narrative synthesis. The retrospective cohort study found approximately one quarter of all referrals were for children presenting with suicidality, and the outcome of these referrals varied greatly between services. The qualitative interviews found most children and parents felt let down by CAMHS, and the service did not meet their needs even when they were seen. Staff were under pressure to deliver short interventions using a prescribed approach. Children, parents, and practitioners all prioritised the relationship with the child above the intervention approach. The thesis goes beyond describing what happens, to present an overall interpretation: even when children who are suicidal were seen by CAMHS they did not feel heard. This was found to reflect not only the current CAMHS systems, but a dominant discourse that denies childhood suicidality in favour of a dialogue around distress. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | University of Stirling | en_GB |
dc.subject | Suicide | en_GB |
dc.subject | children | en_GB |
dc.subject | Young People | en_GB |
dc.subject | CAMHS | en_GB |
dc.subject | mental health | en_GB |
dc.subject | adolescent | en_GB |
dc.subject | self-harm | en_GB |
dc.subject | Foucault | en_GB |
dc.subject | mixed methods | en_GB |
dc.subject | Discourse | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Children Services for Great Britain | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Child mental health | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Suicide Prevention | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | CAMHS Network | en_GB |
dc.title | Seen but not heard: An exploration of the care journeys and experiences of children, their parents and CAMHS (Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services) practitioners after children are referred to CAMHS for reasons of suicidality | en_GB |
dc.type | Thesis or Dissertation | en_GB |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en_GB |
dc.type.qualificationname | Doctor of Philosophy | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2023-09-30 | - |
dc.rights.embargoreason | I wish to publish my findings.. At the request of the author the thesis has been embargoed for a number of months with an authorised exception to the UKRI required 12 month maximum. UKRI have agreed that, at the discretion of the University, authors can request short extensions beyond the prescribed 12 months. | en_GB |
dc.contributor.funder | ESRC | en_GB |
dc.author.email | mrslynnefoster@icloud.com | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoterms | 2023-10-01 | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoliftdate | 2023-10-01 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport eTheses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LG - PhD Thesis .pdf | 8.02 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.