Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33138
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSnooks, Helenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWatkins, Alan Johnen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBell, Fionaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBrady, Mikeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCarson-Stevens, Andyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, Edwarden_UK
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Bridie Angelaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorEngland, Louiseen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFoster, Theresaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGallanders, Johnen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGunson, Imogenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHarris-Mayes, Roberten_UK
dc.contributor.authorKingston, Marken_UK
dc.contributor.authorLyons, Ronanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Elishaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-25T00:02:09Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-25T00:02:09Z-
dc.date.issued2021-08en_UK
dc.identifier.othere12492en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/33138-
dc.description.abstractObjectives During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom (UK), to describe volume and pattern of calls to emergency ambulance services, proportion of calls where an ambulance was dispatched, proportion conveyed to hospital, and features of triage used. Methods Semistructured electronic survey of all UK ambulance services (n = 13) and a request for routine service data on weekly call volumes for 22 weeks (February 1–July 3, 2020). Questionnaires and data request were emailed to chief executives and research leads followed by email and telephone reminders. The routine data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and questionnaire data using thematic analysis. Results Completed questionnaires were received from 12 services. Call volume varied widely between services, with a UK peak at week 7 at 13.1% above baseline (service range -0.5% to +31.4%). All services ended the study period with a lower call volume than at baseline (service range -3.7% to -25.5%). Suspected COVID-19 calls across the UK totaled 604,146 (13.5% of all calls), with wide variation between services (service range 3.7% to 25.7%), and in service peaks of 11.4% to 44.5%. Ambulances were dispatched to 478,638 (79.2%) of these calls (service range 59.0% to 100.0%), with 262,547 (43.5%) resulting in conveyance to hospital (service range 32.0% to 53.9%). Triage models varied between services and over time. Two primary call triage systems were in use across the UK. There were a large number of products and arrangements used for secondary triage, with services using paramedics, nurses, and doctors to support decision making in the call center and on scene. Frequent changes to triage processes took place. Conclusions Call volumes were highly variable. Case mix and workload changed significantly as COVID-19 calls displaced other calls. Triage models and prehospital outcomes varied between services. We urgently need to understand safety and effectiveness of triage models to inform care during further waves and pandemics.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWiley Open Accessen_UK
dc.relationSnooks H, Watkins AJ, Bell F, Brady M, Carson-Stevens A, Duncan E, Evans BA, England L, Foster T, Gallanders J, Gunson I, Harris-Mayes R, Kingston M, Lyons R & Miller E (2021) Call volume, triage outcomes, and protocols during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom: Results of a national survey. Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open, 2 (4), Art. No.: e12492. https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12492en_UK
dc.rights© 2021 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Emergency Physicians This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectambulancesen_UK
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_UK
dc.subjectpandemicen_UK
dc.subjectprehospital emergency careen_UK
dc.subjecttriageen_UK
dc.titleCall volume, triage outcomes, and protocols during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom: Results of a national surveyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/emp2.12492en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid34378000en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Openen_UK
dc.citation.issn2688-1152en_UK
dc.citation.issn2688-1152en_UK
dc.citation.volume2en_UK
dc.citation.issue4en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.citation.date02/08/2021en_UK
dc.description.notesAdditional co-authors: Andy Newton, Alison Porter, Tom Quinn, Andy Rosser, Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena, Robert Spaight, Victoria Williamsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSwansea Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSwansea Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationYorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationWelsh Ambulance Serviceen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCardiff Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSwansea Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEast Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEast of England Ambulance Service NHS Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSwansea Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationWest Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationIndependenten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSwansea Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSwansea Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationYorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trusten_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1749766en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3400-905Xen_UK
dc.date.accepted2021-06-09en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-06-09en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2021-08-24en_UK
dc.subject.tagCOVID-19en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorSnooks, Helen|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWatkins, Alan John|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBell, Fiona|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBrady, Mike|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCarson-Stevens, Andy|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDuncan, Edward|0000-0002-3400-905Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorEvans, Bridie Angela|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorEngland, Louise|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFoster, Theresa|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGallanders, John|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGunson, Imogen|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHarris-Mayes, Robert|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKingston, Mark|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLyons, Ronan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMiller, Elisha|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2021-08-24en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2021-08-24|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameemp2.12492.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2688-1152en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
emp2.12492.pdfFulltext - Published Version370.53 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.