Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33004
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCarolei, Domenicoen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-29T00:06:20Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-29T00:06:20Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06-30en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/33004-
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates the extent to which different type of Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) practice beneficiary accountability (transparency, participation, and complaints procedure) within their own structure. Geographically, it focuses on Italian CSOs. On methodological level, a multiple case study analysis has been carried out. In particular, five CSOs had been purposefully selected and twenty multiple interviews with CSO managers and key accountability stakeholders/beneficiaries were conducted to allow data triangulation. Research findings indicate that beneficiary accountability is performed differently by diverse CSOs and it appears weak, informal and inconsistent across case-studies, especially in relation to compliance procedure and direct means of participation: the latter are poorly implemented regardless of congenital differences among CSOs (e.g. size, type and nature).en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.relationCarolei D (2020) Are Civil Society Organisations Accountable to their Beneficiaries?. <i>Atâtôt - Revista Interdisciplinar de Direitos Humanos da UEG</i>, 1 (1), pp. 25-51. https://www.revista.ueg.br/index.php/atatot/article/view/9940en_UK
dc.rightsPublisher is open-access. Open access publishing allows free access to and distribution of published articles where the author retains copyright of their work by employing a Creative Commons attribution licence. Proper attribution of authorship and correct citation details should be given.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdfen_UK
dc.subjectAccountabilityen_UK
dc.subjectBeneficiaryen_UK
dc.subjectCSOsen_UK
dc.subjectItalyen_UK
dc.titleAre Civil Society Organisations Accountable to their Beneficiaries?en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleAtâtôt ​​- Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Rights (UEG)en_UK
dc.citation.volume1en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage25en_UK
dc.citation.epage51en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.revista.ueg.br/index.php/atatot/article/view/9940en_UK
dc.citation.date30/07/2020en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLawen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1688520en_UK
dc.date.accepted2020-03-17en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-03-17en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2021-07-28en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot chargeden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorCarolei, Domenico|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2021-07-28en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdf|2021-07-28|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename9940-Article Text-39000-1-10-20200629.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
9940-Article Text-39000-1-10-20200629.pdfFulltext - Published Version714.2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.