Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32941
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Research Reports
Title: Revisiting Data: Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data Exploring New Public Management and Nursing Relationships in the NHS’
Author(s): Hoyle, Louise
Contact Email: louise.hoyle@stir.ac.uk
Citation: Hoyle L (2020) Revisiting Data: Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data Exploring New Public Management and Nursing Relationships in the NHS’. SAGE Research Methods Cases. London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529724363
Keywords: new public management
National Health Service
nursing management
health and relationships
teams
theses
mass media
decision making
nurses
work teams
information sources
public health
Issue Date: 2020
Date Deposited: 28-Apr-2020
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Series/Report no.: SAGE Research Methods Cases
Abstract: This case study addresses some of the challenges and opportunities of revisiting data for a new purpose. In 2011, data was collected for a PhD, which aimed to explore the impact of new public management and nursing relationships in the NHS. This was analysed and written up for a PhD thesis. However, only a proportion of the collected data made it into the final cut of the PhD. Within a PhD it is important to have a clear narrative and so it is likely that aspects of the data will be discarded or left until later. Several years after PhD completion, in response to new research concerns, the data was revisited with a view to further analysis in order to reveal possible new and previously hidden insights. This case study takes you step by step through the process used to do this, and highlights key points for decision-making to ensure rigour in this retrospective analysis.
Type: Research Report
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32941
DOI Link: 10.4135/9781529724363
Rights: Hoyle L (2020) Revisiting Data: Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data Exploring New Public Management and Nursing Relationships in the NHS’. SAGE Research Methods Cases: Medicine and Health. London. Copyright © SAGE Publications, 2020. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications. Reuse is restricted to non-commercial and no derivative uses. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529724363
Affiliation: Health Sciences Stirling
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hoyle.Review_cleanversion.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version321.53 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.