Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32916
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Maharaj, Savitri | - |
dc.contributor.advisor | Rutherford, Alasdair | - |
dc.contributor.advisor | Jones, Glyn | - |
dc.contributor.author | Docherty, Craig William | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-14T09:21:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-14T09:21:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-09 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32916 | - |
dc.description.abstract | After the devastating introduction of Chalara ash dieback into Great Britain in 2012, all devolved GB governments agreed on the need for increased public engagement in protecting tree and plant health. Serious games have been proposed as a tool for achieving this. This thesis explores two questions. Firstly, to what extent is there an appetite for using Serious Games among plant health professionals and the general public? Furthermore, when compared to traditional methods of presenting information in public engagement, can Serious Games improve participant engagement and retention of information? To address the first question, we conducted two studies of attitudes to Serious Games. In the first study, we conducted face-to-face structured interviews of tree and plant health professionals. In this group, we found that there was interest in the potential use of Serious Games; however, a lack of game development skills emerged as a challenge. In the second study, we used an online survey aimed at the general public to ask about attitudes, preferences, and experiences with Serious Games. Again, we found that there was an interest in the use of games with some reservations. In addressing the second question, two experiments were conducted comparing game and non-game methods of presenting identical information to participants. These experiments measured enjoyment and retention of information. In both experiments, the non-game treatment participants had higher quiz results, suggesting that the Serious Game treatment did not improve information retention. This may be because the learning content was not sufficiently related to the games. Additionally, despite Game players reporting a higher perceived level of learning in the second experiment this did not translate to longer term retention of information. We conclude that Serious Games can be useful in arousing interest; however, careful design is needed if they are to promote, rather than distract from, learning. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | University of Stirling | en_GB |
dc.subject | Serious Games | en_GB |
dc.subject | Tree and Plant Health | en_GB |
dc.subject | Games | en_GB |
dc.subject | Education | en_GB |
dc.subject | Trees | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Trees | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Trees Care of Citizen participation | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Trees Diseases and pests | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Trees Health Great Britain. | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Plant health | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Plant ecology | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Public opinion Great Britain | en_GB |
dc.title | Scoping the Potential Use of Serious Games for Public Engagement with Tree and Plant Health | en_GB |
dc.type | Thesis or Dissertation | en_GB |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en_GB |
dc.type.qualificationname | Doctor of Philosophy | en_GB |
dc.contributor.funder | Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), The University of Stirling, Department of Computing Science and Mathematics | en_GB |
dc.author.email | cwd00002@gmail.com | en_GB |
Appears in Collections: | Computing Science and Mathematics eTheses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PhD Thesis Submission - C Docherty - 2014756 - With Amendments.docx | Word document of the thesis | 7.97 MB | Microsoft Word XML | View/Open |
PhD Thesis - C W Docherty.pdf | PDF version of the thesis | 4.61 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.