Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32916
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMaharaj, Savitri-
dc.contributor.advisorRutherford, Alasdair-
dc.contributor.advisorJones, Glyn-
dc.contributor.authorDocherty, Craig William-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-14T09:21:22Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-14T09:21:22Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/32916-
dc.description.abstractAfter the devastating introduction of Chalara ash dieback into Great Britain in 2012, all devolved GB governments agreed on the need for increased public engagement in protecting tree and plant health. Serious games have been proposed as a tool for achieving this. This thesis explores two questions. Firstly, to what extent is there an appetite for using Serious Games among plant health professionals and the general public? Furthermore, when compared to traditional methods of presenting information in public engagement, can Serious Games improve participant engagement and retention of information? To address the first question, we conducted two studies of attitudes to Serious Games. In the first study, we conducted face-to-face structured interviews of tree and plant health professionals. In this group, we found that there was interest in the potential use of Serious Games; however, a lack of game development skills emerged as a challenge. In the second study, we used an online survey aimed at the general public to ask about attitudes, preferences, and experiences with Serious Games. Again, we found that there was an interest in the use of games with some reservations. In addressing the second question, two experiments were conducted comparing game and non-game methods of presenting identical information to participants. These experiments measured enjoyment and retention of information. In both experiments, the non-game treatment participants had higher quiz results, suggesting that the Serious Game treatment did not improve information retention. This may be because the learning content was not sufficiently related to the games. Additionally, despite Game players reporting a higher perceived level of learning in the second experiment this did not translate to longer term retention of information. We conclude that Serious Games can be useful in arousing interest; however, careful design is needed if they are to promote, rather than distract from, learning.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Stirlingen_GB
dc.subjectSerious Gamesen_GB
dc.subjectTree and Plant Healthen_GB
dc.subjectGamesen_GB
dc.subjectEducationen_GB
dc.subjectTreesen_GB
dc.subject.lcshTreesen_GB
dc.subject.lcshTrees Care of Citizen participationen_GB
dc.subject.lcshTrees Diseases and pestsen_GB
dc.subject.lcshTrees Health Great Britain.en_GB
dc.subject.lcshPlant healthen_GB
dc.subject.lcshPlant ecologyen_GB
dc.subject.lcshPublic opinion Great Britainen_GB
dc.titleScoping the Potential Use of Serious Games for Public Engagement with Tree and Plant Healthen_GB
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctor of Philosophyen_GB
dc.contributor.funderDepartment for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), The University of Stirling, Department of Computing Science and Mathematicsen_GB
dc.author.emailcwd00002@gmail.comen_GB
Appears in Collections:Computing Science and Mathematics eTheses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PhD Thesis Submission - C Docherty - 2014756 - With Amendments.docxWord document of the thesis7.97 MBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
PhD Thesis - C W Docherty.pdfPDF version of the thesis4.61 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.