Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32740
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWoolham, Johnen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFreddolino, Paulen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGibson, Granten_UK
dc.contributor.authorDaniels, Sarahen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T00:04:59Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-23T00:04:59Z-
dc.date.issued2021-09-08en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/32740-
dc.description.abstractPurpose This paper aims to report on a structured attempt to develop new directions for research into telecare. Current research evidence suggests that telecare in the UK is not optimally cost-effective and does not deliver better outcomes than more traditional forms of care and support. To address this problem, an analysis of expert opinion about future directions for research is provided. Design/methodology/approach Two electronic surveys of UK based academic experts were conducted. Participants were drawn from a range of professional disciplines, including medicine, social care, occupational therapy and social policy and identified were by their contribution in this, or allied fields. The first survey included nine questions intended to identify at least one new research question that could form the basis of a funding proposal to the Nuffield Foundation, which provided “seedcorn” funding to support this work. Ten themes were identified following thematic analysis. The second survey asked participants to prioritise three of these themes. Findings Key themes emerging as priority areas for future research were as follows: the role of assessment in ensuring technology deployment meets the needs of service users; ethical implications of technology and how these might be addressed in the future; and the use of end user co-production/co-creation approaches in the development of new assistive technologies and digital enabled care. Research limitations/implications The findings are based on academic expert opinion; perspectives of practitioners, service users and family members are unrepresented. Practical implications The findings of this study could contribute to development of new directions for telecare research, and future strategic funding decisions in this rapidly changing field. Originality/value Evidence for sub-optimal outcomes for telecare requires new thinking. The authors are not aware of any other study that offers an analysis of expert opinion of fruitful areas for new research into telecare.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherEmeralden_UK
dc.relationWoolham J, Freddolino P, Gibson G & Daniels S (2021) Telecare at a crossroads? Finding researchable questions. Journal of Enabling Technologies, 15 (3), pp. 175-188. https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-11-2020-0049en_UK
dc.rightsPublisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Journal of Enabling Technologies by Emerald. The original publication is available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-11-2020-0049. This article is deposited under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial International Licence 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0). Any reuse is allowed in accordance with the terms outlined by the licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). To reuse the AAM for commercial purposes, permission should be sought by contacting permissions@emeraldinsight.com.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectTelecareen_UK
dc.subjectEnabling technologyen_UK
dc.subjectExpert opinionen_UK
dc.subjectFuture areas for researchen_UK
dc.subjectNew prioritiesen_UK
dc.subjectOptimising impact and effectivenessen_UK
dc.titleTelecare at a crossroads? Finding researchable questionsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/JET-11-2020-0049en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Enabling Technologiesen_UK
dc.citation.issn2398-6263en_UK
dc.citation.volume15en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.spage175en_UK
dc.citation.epage188en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderThe Nuffield Foundationen_UK
dc.citation.date25/05/2021en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationKing's College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationMichigan State Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationDementia and Ageingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationImperial College Londonen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000655186900001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85106434523en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1734668en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8249-4697en_UK
dc.date.accepted2021-03-20en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-03-20en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2021-06-22en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorWoolham, John|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFreddolino, Paul|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGibson, Grant|0000-0001-8249-4697en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDaniels, Sarah|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|The Nuffield Foundation|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2021-06-22en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/|2021-06-22|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameTelecare at a crossroads - Draft 8.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2398-6263en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Telecare at a crossroads - Draft 8.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version372.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.