Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32721
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBurton, Gillianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcAuley, Andrewen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSchofield, Joeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorYeung, Alanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMatheson, Catrionaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorParkes, Tessaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T00:06:47Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-16T00:06:47Z-
dc.date.issued2021-10en_UK
dc.identifier.other103298en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/32721-
dc.description.abstractBackground Drug-related deaths globally are increasing year on year, with the largest proportion of these being opioid-related. The opioid antagonist naloxone distributed for take-home use (‘Take-Home Naloxone (THN)’) has been championed as one method of tackling this public health crisis, however to be effective it must be available at an opioid overdose. Ownership and carriage are therefore fundamental to THN success. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of ownership and carriage of THN internationally among people who use drugs (PWUD). Methods NHS Scotland Journals, AMED, EMBASE, HMIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL Complete, PubMed, Cochrane Library, PROSPERO and grey literature were searched for articles which measured prevalence of THN ownership or carriage between 1996 and 2020. Ownership was defined as report of a personal supply of THN. Carriage was defined as the participant carrying THN on their person at time of data collection or reporting a frequency of how often they carry THN. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Checklist for Prevalence Studies. Results Systematic search yielded 6363 papers, with ten eligible papers identified. Eight articles were included in ownership prevalence and five articles included for carriage prevalence, with an overlap of three studies between both measures. Pooled prevalence indicated moderate ownership levels (57%, CI 47-67%) but lower carriage levels (20%, CI 12-31%). Analysis was complicated by the limited number of available studies and lack of standardised terminology and measurement. Conclusion Understanding naloxone ownership and carriage globally is hampered by limited evidence and heterogeneity across studies. From the available data, prevalence of THN carriage overall appears low, despite moderate ownership. Given the variation across studies, future research should seek to utilise more standardised terminology and methods of measurement. Furthermore, services distributing THN must ensure the importance of regular carriage of naloxone is consistently emphasised.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationBurton G, McAuley A, Schofield J, Yeung A, Matheson C & Parkes T (2021) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of take-home naloxone (THN) ownership and carriage. International Journal of Drug Policy, 96, Art. No.: 103298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103298en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You are not required to obtain permission to reuse this article.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectTake-home naloxoneen_UK
dc.subjectDrug-related deathsen_UK
dc.subjectMeta-analysisen_UK
dc.titleA systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of take-home naloxone (THN) ownership and carriageen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103298en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid34078563en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleInternational Journal of Drug Policyen_UK
dc.citation.issn0955-3959en_UK
dc.citation.volume96en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderEconomic and Social Research Councilen_UK
dc.citation.date30/05/2021en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Social Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGlasgow Caledonian Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Social Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGlasgow Caledonian Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Social Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Social Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000755111900015en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85107679250en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1734689en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8619-822Xen_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1307-2375en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0409-3254en_UK
dc.date.accepted2021-05-09en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-05-09en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2021-06-15en_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBurton, Gillian|0000-0001-8619-822Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcAuley, Andrew|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSchofield, Joe|0000-0002-1307-2375en_UK
local.rioxx.authorYeung, Alan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMatheson, Catriona|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorParkes, Tessa|0000-0002-0409-3254en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Economic and Social Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000269en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2021-06-15en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2021-06-15|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1-s2.0-S0955395921002048-main.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0955-3959en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0955395921002048-main.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.