Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32467
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCritchlow, Nathanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMoodie, Crawforden_UK
dc.contributor.authorBest, Catherineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorStead, Martineen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-24T01:09:27Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-24T01:09:27Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03en_UK
dc.identifier.othere042724en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/32467-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: As tobacco companies can circumvent tax increases, a minimum retail price per-cigarette/per gram of roll-your-own tobacco presents an additional mechanism for governments to reduce smoking. We examined (1) anticipated responses to a hypothetical minimum price-per-cigarette/per-gram among smokers in the UK; (2) what demographic and smoker characteristics are associated with anticipated responses; and (3) whether minimum pricing may help ex-smokers stay quit. Design: Cross-sectional survey (May–July 2019). Setting: UK. Participants: Adult cigarette smokers (n=2412) and ex smokers (n=700). Main outcome measurements: Anticipated responses to a hypothetical minimum price of £10.00 for 20 cigarettes (£0.50 per-cigarette) and £13.50 for 30 grams of roll-your-own tobacco (£0.45 per-gram); approximately £0.10 per-cigarette/per-gram increases on the cheapest prices in leading UK supermarkets (January 2019). Smokers were presented with ten options (eg, ‘Try to quit’) and asked which they would do (Yes/No) and then which they would most likely do. Ex-smokers were asked to what extent the minimum prices would help them stay quit (A lot vs Lesser agreement). Results: Among smokers, 55.6% said they would most likely smoke the same amount, 10.7% they would smoke less, 9.5% they would try to quit and 5.8% they would use e-cigarettes more often. Anticipated reactions were associated with demography and smoker characteristics, for example, C2DE (lower social grade) smokers were less likely than ABC1 (higher social grade) smokers to say they would smoke the same as they do now (ORAdj=0.74, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.88). Among ex-smokers, 38.5% said the minimum prices would help them stay quit ‘A lot’, more so among C2DE than ABC1 participants (ORAdj=1.80, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.49). Conclusions: In response to a hypothetical minimum price for cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco, approximately a fifth of smokers in the UK indicated they would smoke less or quit and almost two-fifths of ex-smokers indicated the prices would help them stay quiten_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_UK
dc.relationCritchlow N, Moodie C, Best C & Stead M (2021) Anticipated responses to a hypothetical minimum price for cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco: An online cross-sectional survey with cigarette smokers and ex-smokers in the UK. BMJ Open, 11 (3), Art. No.: e042724. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042724en_UK
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectMinimum pricingen_UK
dc.subjectSmokingen_UK
dc.subjectTobacco Controlen_UK
dc.subjectCross-sectional surveyen_UK
dc.subjectSmoking cessationen_UK
dc.subjectPricingen_UK
dc.subjectTaxationen_UK
dc.subjectTobacco price strategyen_UK
dc.titleAnticipated responses to a hypothetical minimum price for cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco: An online cross-sectional survey with cigarette smokers and ex-smokers in the UKen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042724en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid33753438en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMJ Openen_UK
dc.citation.issn2044-6055en_UK
dc.citation.volume11en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderBritish Heart Foundationen_UK
dc.contributor.funderDepartment of Healthen_UK
dc.author.emailnathan.critchlow@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date22/03/2021en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000632921900013en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85101983677en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1711691en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9145-8874en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1805-2509en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3652-2498en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3066-4604en_UK
dc.date.accepted2021-03-05en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-03-05en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2021-03-22en_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectWhat is the longer-term response of smokers and ex-smokers to standardised packaging and how does standardised packaging impact on health inequalities? Adult Tobacco Policy Survey Wave 3en_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectAdult Tobacco Policy Surveyen_UK
dc.relation.funderrefsee funder letteren_UK
dc.relation.funderrefC30469/A18507 & 008/P&C/CORE/2014/TAGen_UK
dc.subject.tagBehavioural and Experimental Economicsen_UK
dc.subject.tagEconomics and Psychologyen_UK
dc.subject.tagPublic Healthen_UK
dc.subject.tagPublic Policyen_UK
dc.subject.tagSmoking Cessationen_UK
dc.subject.tagSocial Marketingen_UK
dc.subject.tagTobacco, Alcohol and Food Marketingen_UK
dc.subject.tagTobacco Marketing : Impact on Health Behaviouren_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorCritchlow, Nathan|0000-0001-9145-8874en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMoodie, Crawford|0000-0002-1805-2509en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBest, Catherine|0000-0002-3652-2498en_UK
local.rioxx.authorStead, Martine|0000-0002-3066-4604en_UK
local.rioxx.projectsee funder letter|Department of Health|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectC30469/A18507 & 008/P&C/CORE/2014/TAG|British Heart Foundation|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000274en_UK
local.rioxx.projectC30469/A18507 & 008/P&C/CORE/2014/TAG|Cancer Research UK|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000289en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2021-03-23en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/|2021-03-23|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameCritchlow et al Min Pricing BMJOpen 21.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2044-6055en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Critchlow et al Min Pricing BMJOpen 21.pdfFulltext - Published Version387.9 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.