Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32349
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMetcalfe, Richard Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorVollaard, Niels B Jen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T01:00:57Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-03T01:00:57Z-
dc.date.issued2021-07en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/32349-
dc.description.abstractInterindividual variability for training-induced changes in maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) is well described following continuous aerobic and high-intensity interval training. Whether similar variability is observed following time-efficient sprint interval training with minimal training volume (i.e., reduced-exertion high-intensity interval training; REHIT) is unknown. We conducted a pooled analysis of n=117 (68 men) training participants (mean±SD: age: 30±10 y; VO2max: 34.8±7.5 ml·kg-1·min-1), who completed a VO2max assessment before and 3 days after 6 weeks of REHIT comprising of two 10-20 second ‘all-out’ cycling sprints per session, and n=40 no-intervention control participants (age: 30±13 y; VO2max: 31.5±6.5 ml·kg-1·min-1) who completed repeated VO2max tests over a comparable timeframe. Individual responses estimated using 50% confidence intervals derived from the technical error were interpreted against a smallest worthwhile change (SWC) of 1.75 ml·kg-1·min-1. The standard deviation of individual responses was 2.39 ml·kg-1·min-1 demonstrating clinically meaningful heterogeneity in training-induced changes in VO2max following REHIT that exceed the technical, biological and random within-subjects variability of VO2max assessment. The likely (75% probability) non-response rate was 18% (21/117), and 49% (57/117) of individuals demonstrated increases in VO2max likely higher than the SWC. We conclude that the well-described increase in VO2max following REHIT at the group level is subject to substantial variability in magnitude at an individual level. This has important implications for exercise prescription and can be harnessed to elucidate mechanisms of adaptation. Novelty: • There is substantial heterogeneity in VO2max responses following time-efficient sprint interval training • Proportion of non-response was 18% and ∽50% of individuals show clinically meaningful increases in VO2maxen_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherCanadian Science Publishingen_UK
dc.relationMetcalfe RS & Vollaard NBJ (2021) Heterogeneity and incidence of non-response for changes in cardiorespiratory fitness following time-efficient sprint interval exercise training. <i>Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism</i>, 46 (7), pp. 735-742. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2020-0855en_UK
dc.rightsCopyright © 2021 Canadian Science Publishing. Richard S. Metcalfe and Niels B.J. Vollaard. Heterogeneity and incidence of non-response for changes in cardiorespiratory fitness following time-efficient sprint interval exercise training. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. 46(7): 735-742. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2020-0855en_UK
dc.rights.urihttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdfen_UK
dc.subjectAerobic Capacityen_UK
dc.subjectHigh-Intensity Interval Trainingen_UK
dc.subjectSprint Interval Trainingen_UK
dc.subjectIndividual Responsesen_UK
dc.subjectIndividual Variabilityen_UK
dc.subjectCardiorespiratory Fitnessen_UK
dc.titleHeterogeneity and incidence of non-response for changes in cardiorespiratory fitness following time-efficient sprint interval exercise trainingen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1139/apnm-2020-0855en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid33417513en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleApplied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolismen_UK
dc.citation.issn1715-5320en_UK
dc.citation.issn1715-5312en_UK
dc.citation.volume46en_UK
dc.citation.issue7en_UK
dc.citation.spage735en_UK
dc.citation.epage742en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.citation.date08/01/2021en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSwansea Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSporten_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000671903000006en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85107550141en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1694277en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4576-8879en_UK
dc.date.accepted2021-01-04en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-01-04en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2021-03-02en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMetcalfe, Richard S|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorVollaard, Niels B J|0000-0002-4576-8879en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2021-03-02en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdf|2021-03-02|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameVariability_in_CRF_response_to REHIT.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1715-5320en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Variability_in_CRF_response_to REHIT.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version339.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.