Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32218
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDanov, Mihailen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBeaumont, Paulen_UK
dc.contributor.editorBonomi, Andreaen_UK
dc.contributor.editorRomano, Gian Paoloen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-30T01:02:15Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-30T01:02:15Z-
dc.date.issued2016en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/32218-
dc.description.abstractA number of harmonised private international law instruments appear to be the foundation of the whole EU civil justice framework, which primarily aims to provide effective remedies for litigants in cross-border cases. Given the level of diversity across the EU, a major feature of the EU legal landscape is the triangular relationship between the allocation of jurisdiction and identification of applicable law, on the one hand, and the available remedy, on the other hand. It appears that, when it comes to the administration of justice in a cross-border context within the EU, this triangular relationship encompasses the ability of the Member States’ courts to deal with cross-border disputes which may be important for the forum selection process. An EU model of administration of justice, which allows litigants to choose where to litigate, may result in some jurisdictions being promoted as dominant. This can only happen, of course, because the EU has already created free movement of judgments in large areas of commercial and family law. Once a judgment has been secured in any one EU Member State it should be enforceable in all others with little or no hindrance. However, litigants may have to consider where a judgment is to be actually enforced given that the rules on actual enforcement are not harmonised in the EU (this may be particularly significant in relation to family law disputes). The dominant jurisdictions could be attracting more cross-border cases, and thus some jurisdictions may become a venue of choice for the high value cross-border disputes. It is important to assess, on the basis of relevant empirical data, how the current EU Civil Justice framework is shaping the litigants’ strategies and whether the objectives of the EU PIL legislative instruments are effectively pursued in a cross-border context. An empirical study is underway in several Member States, with different legal traditions/heritages.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherVerlag Dr. Otto Schmidten_UK
dc.relationDanov M & Beaumont P (2016) Measuring the Effectiveness of the EU Civil Justice Framework: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges. In: Bonomi A & Romano GP (eds.) Yearbook of Private International Law (2015/2016). Yearbook of Private International Law, XVII. Koln: Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt, pp. 151-180. https://doi.org/10.9785/9783504385163-008en_UK
dc.relation.ispartofseriesYearbook of Private International Law, XVIIen_UK
dc.rightsDanov M & Beaumont P (2016) Measuring the Effectiveness of the EU Civil Justice Framework: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges. In: Bonomi A & Romano GP (eds.) Yearbook of Private International Law (2015/2016). Yearbook of Private International Law, XVII. Koln: Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt, pp. 151-180. https://doi.org/10.9785/9783504385163-008. The final publication is available at www.degruyter.comen_UK
dc.rights.urihttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdfen_UK
dc.titleMeasuring the Effectiveness of the EU Civil Justice Framework: Theoretical and Methodological Challengesen_UK
dc.typePart of book or chapter of booken_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.9785/9783504385163-008en_UK
dc.citation.issn1566-6352en_UK
dc.citation.spage151en_UK
dc.citation.epage180en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commission (Horizon 2020)en_UK
dc.citation.btitleYearbook of Private International Law (2015/2016)en_UK
dc.citation.isbn9783504385163en_UK
dc.publisher.addressKolnen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Leedsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1700675en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-12-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2021-01-29en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeBook chapteren_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorDanov, Mihail|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBeaumont, Paul|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|European Commission (Horizon 2020)|en_UK
local.rioxx.contributorBonomi, Andrea|en_UK
local.rioxx.contributorRomano, Gian Paolo|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2021-01-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdf|2021-01-29|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename132263181.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source9783504385163en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Book Chapters and Sections

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
132263181.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version345.26 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.