Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32146
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Why the chosen ones may not always be the best leaders: Criteria for captain selection as predictors of leadership quality and acceptance
Author(s): Butalia, Radhika
Fransen, Katrien
Coffee, Pete
Laenens, Jolien
Boen, Filip
Contact Email: peter.coffee@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: team captain
athlete leadership
peer leadership
captain selection
leadership quality
leader acceptance
Citation: Butalia R, Fransen K, Coffee P, Laenens J & Boen F (2020) Why the chosen ones may not always be the best leaders: Criteria for captain selection as predictors of leadership quality and acceptance. Frontiers in Psychology.
Abstract: There seems to be some initial evidence that team captains are selected based on non-leadership factors such as team tenure, technical abilities, being the daughter of the club president, or playing position. This is concerning since players expect their ideal team captain to have superior motivational and social skills. Adding to this literature on captain selection, the present study investigates relationships between the reasons for which team captains are selected and their (a) perceived leadership quality; and (b) perceived acceptance. To accomplish this, we recruited 450 coaches and 198 players from Flemish football and volleyball teams. Participants evaluated 41 reasons on the extent to which they played a role 18 in the selection of their team captain. Additionally, participants rated their team captain’s leadership quality and level of acceptance. The results consistently indicated that captains who were selected for having good motivational and social competencies were given higher ratings on perceived leadership quality and acceptance by participants. In conclusion, athletes who are motivated, good at motivating others and have superior social skills tend to be better suited for captaincy than those selected based on non-leadership factors.
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Notes: Output Status: Forthcoming

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Butalia et al. (2021).pdfFulltext - Accepted Version504.33 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2022-12-21    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.