Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32117
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Making authentic: exploring boundary objects and bricolage in knowledge mobilisation through National Health Service-university partnerships
Author(s): Melville-Richards, Lucy
Rycroft-Malone, Joanne
Burton, Christopher
Wilkinson, Joyce
Keywords: Boundary object
bricolage
co-production
knowledge mobilisation
Issue Date: Nov-2020
Date Deposited: 22-Dec-2020
Citation: Melville-Richards L, Rycroft-Malone J, Burton C & Wilkinson J (2020) Making authentic: exploring boundary objects and bricolage in knowledge mobilisation through National Health Service-university partnerships. Evidence and Policy, 16 (4), pp. 517-539. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426419x15623134271106
Abstract: Background: In healthcare, bridging the research-to-practice gap is a top priority. Knowledge mobilisation scholars suggest that this gap can be closed through collaboration between knowledge users and producers. The concept of boundary objects ‐ shared things and ideas that enable communication ‐ has gained popularity across various collaborative work practices, but their potential within knowledge mobilisation in health care is understudied. An ongoing challenge for designers of boundary objects is how to create objects that are valued and shared both in principle and in practice. Aims and objectives: This paper reports on a study of boundary objects used during knowledge mobilisation through NHS-university partnerships called Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs). The distinction is investigated between boundary objects-in-theory and boundary objects-in-use, considering whether the latter possess specific characteristics which make them more effective during knowledge mobilisation. Methods: A qualitative case study of three CLAHRCs was conducted. Twenty-one people employed as ‘boundary spanners’ were interviewed to explore whether boundary objects played a role in knowledge mobilisation. Findings: The most effective boundary objects-in-use were co-produced through a process of bricolage. These possessed high levels of meaningfulness and resonance, and reconciled multiple user perspectives. Together these properties contributed to the overall authenticity of boundary objects-in-use. Discussion and conclusion: This paper helps to explain why designated boundary objects frequently fail in practice, and why there is a need to focus on understanding boundary objects based on symbolic, rather than structural, dimensions.
DOI Link: 10.1332/174426419x15623134271106
Rights: This is a post-peer-review, pre-copy edited version of an article published in Evidence and Policy. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Melville-Richards L, Rycroft-Malone J, Burton C & Wilkinson J (2020) Making authentic: exploring boundary objects and bricolage in knowledge mobilisation through National Health Service-University partnerships. Evidence and Policy, 16 (4), pp. 517-539 is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1332/174426419x15623134271106
Licence URL(s): https://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdf

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2019_Making_Authentic.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version1.41 MBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.