Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32017
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAnokye, Nanaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFox-Rushby, Juliaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSanghera, Sabinaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCook, Derek Gen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLimb, Elizabethen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFurness, Cherylen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKerry, Sally Margareten_UK
dc.contributor.authorVictor, Christina Ren_UK
dc.contributor.authorIliffe, Steveen_UK
dc.contributor.authorUssher, Michaelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWhincup, Peter Hen_UK
dc.contributor.authorEkelund, Ulfen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDewilde, Stephenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Tessen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-28T01:14:14Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-28T01:14:14Z-
dc.date.issued2018-10en_UK
dc.identifier.othere021978en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/32017-
dc.description.abstractObjectives A short-term and long-term cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of two pedometer-based walking interventions compared with usual care. Design (A) Short-term CEA: Parallel three-arm cluster randomised trial randomised by household. (B) Long-term CEA: Markov decision model. Setting Seven primary care practices in South London, UK. Participants (A) Short-term CEA: 1023 people (922 households) aged 45-75 years without physical activity (PA) contraindications. (b) Long-term CEA: A cohort of 100 000 people aged 59-88 years. Interventions Pedometers, 12-week walking programmes and PA diaries delivered by post or through three PA consultations with practice nurses. Primary and secondary outcome measures Accelerometer-measured change (baseline to 12 months) in average daily step count and time in 10 min bouts of moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA), and EQ-5D-5L quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). Methods Resource use costs (£2013/2014) from a National Health Service perspective, presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for each outcome over a 1-year and lifetime horizon, with cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and willingness to pay per QALY. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses evaluate uncertainty. Results (A) Short-term CEA: At 12 months, incremental cost was £3.61 (£109)/min in ≥10 min MVPA bouts for nurse support compared with control (postal group). At £20 000/QALY, the postal group had a 50% chance of being cost saving compared with control. (B) Long-term CEA: The postal group had more QALYs (+759 QALYs, 95% CI 400 to 1247) and lower costs (-£11 million, 95% CI -12 to -10) than control and nurse groups, resulting in an incremental net monetary benefit of £26 million per 100 000 population. Results were sensitive to reporting serious adverse events, excluding health service use, and including all participant costs. Conclusions Postal delivery of a pedometer intervention in primary care is cost-effective long term and has a 50% chance of being cost-effective, through resource savings, within 1 year. Further research should ascertain maintenance of the higher levels of PA, and its impact on quality of life and health service use. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_UK
dc.relationAnokye N, Fox-Rushby J, Sanghera S, Cook DG, Limb E, Furness C, Kerry SM, Victor CR, Iliffe S, Ussher M, Whincup PH, Ekelund U, Dewilde S & Harris T (2018) Short-term and long-term cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based exercise intervention in primary care: A within-trial analysis and beyond-trial modelling. BMJ Open, 8 (10), Art. No.: e021978. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021978en_UK
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectaccelerometryen_UK
dc.subjectadulten_UK
dc.subjectageden_UK
dc.subjectArticleen_UK
dc.subjectcohort analysisen_UK
dc.subjectconsultationen_UK
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_UK
dc.subjectcost effectiveness analysisen_UK
dc.subjectEQ-5D-5L utility scoreen_UK
dc.subjectexerciseen_UK
dc.subjecthealth care deliveryen_UK
dc.subjecthealth care utilizationen_UK
dc.subjecthealth economicsen_UK
dc.subjecthumanen_UK
dc.subjectmajor clinical studyen_UK
dc.subjectmulticenter studyen_UK
dc.subjectparallel designen_UK
dc.subjectpedometryen_UK
dc.subjectprimary medical careen_UK
dc.subjectquality adjusted life yearen_UK
dc.subjectquality of life assessmenten_UK
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trialen_UK
dc.subjectstep counten_UK
dc.subjectwalkingen_UK
dc.subjectactimetryen_UK
dc.subjectactivity trackeren_UK
dc.subjectageen_UK
dc.subjectclinical trialen_UK
dc.subjectcost benefit analysisen_UK
dc.subjectdemographyen_UK
dc.subjecteconomicsen_UK
dc.subjectEnglanden_UK
dc.subjectfemaleen_UK
dc.subjecthealth promotionen_UK
dc.subjectmaleen_UK
dc.subjectMarkov chainen_UK
dc.subjectmental healthen_UK
dc.subjectmiddle ageden_UK
dc.subjectnurseen_UK
dc.subjectorganization and managementen_UK
dc.subjectpostal mailen_UK
dc.subjectprimary health careen_UK
dc.subjectprogram evaluationen_UK
dc.subjectself concepten_UK
dc.subjectsex factoren_UK
dc.subjectsocioeconomicsen_UK
dc.subjectvery elderly, Actigraphyen_UK
dc.subjectAge Factorsen_UK
dc.subjectAgeden_UK
dc.subjectAged, 80 and overen_UK
dc.subjectCost-Benefit Analysisen_UK
dc.subjectFemaleen_UK
dc.subjectFitness Trackersen_UK
dc.subjectHealth Promotionen_UK
dc.subjectHumansen_UK
dc.subjectLondonen_UK
dc.subjectMaleen_UK
dc.subjectMarkov Chainsen_UK
dc.subjectMental Healthen_UK
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_UK
dc.subjectNursesen_UK
dc.subjectPostal Serviceen_UK
dc.subjectPrimary Health Careen_UK
dc.subjectProgram Evaluationen_UK
dc.subjectQuality-Adjusted Life Yearsen_UK
dc.subjectResidence Characteristicsen_UK
dc.subjectSelf Efficacyen_UK
dc.subjectSex Factorsen_UK
dc.subjectSocioeconomic Factorsen_UK
dc.subjectWalkingen_UK
dc.titleShort-term and long-term cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based exercise intervention in primary care: A within-trial analysis and beyond-trial modellingen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021978en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid30337309en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMJ Openen_UK
dc.citation.issn2044-6055en_UK
dc.citation.volume8en_UK
dc.citation.issue10en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNational Institute for Health Researchen_UK
dc.citation.date17/10/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBrunel Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationKing's College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bristolen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationQueen Mary, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBrunel Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNorwegian School of Sport Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000454739500067en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85055075342en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1684739en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0995-7955en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-08-20en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-08-20en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-11-27en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorAnokye, Nana|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFox-Rushby, Julia|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSanghera, Sabina|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCook, Derek G|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLimb, Elizabeth|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFurness, Cheryl|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKerry, Sally Margaret|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorVictor, Christina R|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorIliffe, Steve|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorUssher, Michael|0000-0002-0995-7955en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWhincup, Peter H|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorEkelund, Ulf|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDewilde, Stephen|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHarris, Tess|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|National Institute for Health Research|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2020-11-27en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2020-11-27|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamee021978.full.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2044-6055en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
e021978.full.pdfFulltext - Published Version505.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.