|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Social Sciences Conference Papers and Proceedings|
|Title:||More-than-human approach to researching AI at work: Alternative narratives for AI and networked learning|
|Editor(s):||De Laat, Maarten|
Bonderup Dohn, Nina
Hansen, Stig Børsen
Hansen, Jens Jørgen
|Citation:||Thompson T & Graham B (2020) More-than-human approach to researching AI at work: Alternative narratives for AI and networked learning. In: De Laat M, Ryberg T, Bonderup Dohn N, Hansen SB & Hansen JJ (eds.) NETWORKED LEARNING 2020: Proceedings for the 12th International Conference on Networked Learning. Networked Learning Conference Proceedings, 12. Twelfth International Conference on Networked Learning 2020, Online, 18.05.2020-20.05.2020. Kolding, Denmark: Aalborg University, pp. 293-300.|
|Series/Report no.:||Networked Learning Conference Proceedings, 12|
|Conference Name:||Twelfth International Conference on Networked Learning 2020|
|Conference Dates:||2020-05-18 - 2020-05-20|
|Abstract:||Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly manifest in everyday work, learning, and living. Reports attempting to gauge public perception suggest that amidst exaggerated expectations and fears about AI, citizens are sceptical and lack understanding of what AI is and does (Archer et al., 2018). Professional workers practice at the intersection of such public perceptions, the AI industry, and regulatory frameworks. Yet, there is limited understanding of the day-to-day interactions and predicaments between workers, AI systems, and the publics they serve. This includes how these interactions and predicaments generate opportunities for learning and highlight new digital fluencies needed. We bring social and computing science perspectives to begin to examine the prevailing AI narratives in professional work and learning practices. Some AIs (such as deep machine learning systems) are so sophisticated that a human-understandable explanation of how it works may not be possible. This raises questions about what professional practitioners are able to know about the AI systems they use: their new digital co-workers. We argue that a co-constitutive human-AI perspective could provide useful insights on questions such as: (1) How is professional expertise and judgment re-distributed as workers negotiate and learn with AI systems? (2) What trust and confidence in new AI-infused work practices is needed or possible and how is this mediated? (3) What are the implications for professional learning: both learning within work and the workplace and more formal curriculum? Given the early stages of this field of inquiry, our aim is to evoke discussion of alternative human-AI narratives suited for the messy—and often unseen—realities of everyday practices.|
|Status:||AM - Accepted Manuscript|
|Rights:||The publisher has not responded to our queries therefore this work cannot be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|thompson graham_2020_nl conf paper.pdf||Fulltext - Accepted Version||217.59 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.