|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Accountabilities of posthuman research|
|Author(s):||Thompson, Terrie Lynn|
|Citation:||Thompson TL & Adams C (2020) Accountabilities of posthuman research. Explorations in Media Ecology, 19 (3), pp. 337-349. https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00050_7|
|Abstract:||What constitutes ‘good’ posthuman research? This article offers three dynamics to help assess the value of posthuman-inspired inquiry. We propose that a good posthuman research account should show evidence that the researcher: (1) attended to their own more-than-humanness and made explicit how they interviewed and attuned to the nonhuman things of their inquiry; (2) reassembled resemblings of the posthuman world by inventively weaving and fusing human and nonhuman storylines; and (3) offered analytic insights into the liveliness of posthuman research work as the performativity of difference.|
|Rights:||This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. © Terrie-Lynn Thompson and Catherine Adams. The definitive, peer reviewed and edited version of this article is published in Explorations in Media Ecology, 19(3), 337-349, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00050_7|
|thompson_adams_2020_EME.pdf||Fulltext - Accepted Version||232.19 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.