Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Book Chapters and Sections
Title: Fairness in Criminal Proceedings: Concluding Thoughts and Further Questions
Author(s): Duff, R A
Contact Email:
Editor(s): Jackson, John D
Summers, Sarah J
Citation: Duff RA (2018) Fairness in Criminal Proceedings: Concluding Thoughts and Further Questions. In: Jackson JD & Summers SJ (eds.) Obstacles to Fairness in Criminal Proceedings: Individual Rights and Institutional Forms. London: Hart Publishing, pp. 301-314.
Issue Date: 2018
Date Deposited: 21-Oct-2020
Abstract: First paragraph: A first, careless, glance at this book ’ s title — Obstacles to Fairness in Criminal Proceedings — might suggest an important but quite limited inquiry: authors are to identify a range of obstacles that inhibit or undermine the fairness of criminal proceedings in the various jurisdictions from within which they are writing, and perhaps go on to think about whether and how such obstacles could be overcome. That kind of inquiry does indeed play a central role in some of the chapters. For instance, Kelly Pitcher asks whether rules concerning the exclusion of improperly obtained evidence efficiently serve (and are best understood as serving) the ends of procedural justice. John Jackson and Sarah Summers, Dimitrios Giannoulopoulos, Wolfgang Wohlers and David Sklansky discuss aspects of the right to legal assistance, and the ways in which its institutional actualisations can serve or hinder fairness. Hannah Quirk focuses on the ways in which the right of silence has been curtailed in recent years, and explores the effects of such curtailments on the ‘ normative expectations ’ that are laid on defendants. Nadja Capus discusses whether a reliance on written records, rather than on oral testimony, is inimical to fairness. However, as the editors and contributors make clear, the book ’ s title actually leads us into several much larger questions. One question concerns the extent of the problem of ‘ obstacles to fairness ’ : just how radical, how deep, is the ‘ irrelation between the professed fair trials standards to which numerous domestic and international systems subscribe and the reality that many criminal proceedings end without these standards being adhered to ’ ? 1 How might this gap (or gulf) between professed standards and actual practice be narrowed ? But other questions take us beyond the problems of even a radical mismatch between professed standards and actual practice.
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Licence URL(s):

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fairness in Criminal Proceedings-2018.pdfFulltext - Published Version101.31 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.