Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31820
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorO’Donnell, Rachelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Graceen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLumsdaine, Colinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDi Tano, Giovannaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSwanston, Lizen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAmos, Gillianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFinnie, Anneen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRowa-Dewar, Nenehen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-16T00:11:04Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-16T00:11:04Z-
dc.date.issued2020-10en_UK
dc.identifier.other7305en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/31820-
dc.description.abstractExposure to second-hand smoke (SHS) in the home is largely associated with socio-economic disadvantage. Disadvantaged parents face specific challenges creating a smoke-free home, often caring for children in accommodation without access to outdoor garden space. Existing smoke-free home interventions largely fail to accommodate these constraints. Innovative approaches are required to address this inequality. In this two-phase study, we engaged with parents living in disadvantaged areas of Edinburgh, Scotland, to explore tailored approaches to creating a smoke-free home and develop and pilot-test an intervention based on their views and preferences. In Phase 1, qualitative interviews with 17 parents recruited from Early Years Centres explored alternative approaches to smoke-free home interventions. In Phase 2, an intervention based on parents’ views and preferences was pilot-tested with parents recruited through Early Years and Family Nurse Partnership centres. Seventeen parents took part in an interview to share their views/experiences of the intervention. Data from both study phases were thematically analysed. Phase 1 findings suggested that parents associated nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) with quit attempts but supported the idea of NRT use for temporary abstinence to create a smoke-free home, viewing this as a safer option than using e-cigarettes indoors. In Phase 2, 54 parents expressed an interest in accessing NRT to create a smoke-free home, 32 discussed NRT product choice during a home visit from a smoking adviser, and 20 collected their free NRT prescription from the pharmacy. NRT was used for up to 12 weeks in the home, with ongoing advice available from pharmacy staff. During qualitative interviews (n = 17), parents self-reported successfully creating a smoke-free home, quitting smoking, and reduced cigarette consumption, often exceeding their expectations regarding changes made. The intervention was acceptable to parents, but the multi-step process used to access NRT was cumbersome. Some participants were lost to this process. Parents living in disadvantaged circumstances may benefit from access to NRT for temporary abstinence in the home to assist them to protect their children from SHS exposure. Further research using a more streamlined approach to NRT access is required to determine the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of this approach.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_UK
dc.relationO’Donnell R, Lewis G, Lumsdaine C, Di Tano G, Swanston L, Amos G, Finnie A & Rowa-Dewar N (2020) Supporting Parents Living in Disadvantaged Areas of Edinburgh to Create a Smoke-Free Home Using Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT): A Two-Phase Qualitative Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (19), Art. No.: 7305. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197305en_UK
dc.rights© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectsmoke-free homeen_UK
dc.subjectnicotine-replacement therapyen_UK
dc.subjecttobacco smoke pollutionen_UK
dc.subjectchilden_UK
dc.subjectparentsen_UK
dc.subjectqualitative researchen_UK
dc.subjectvulnerable populationsen_UK
dc.subjectpharmaciesen_UK
dc.subjectpublic healthen_UK
dc.titleSupporting Parents Living in Disadvantaged Areas of Edinburgh to Create a Smoke-Free Home Using Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT): A Two-Phase Qualitative Studyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph17197305en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid33036327en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthen_UK
dc.citation.issn1660-4601en_UK
dc.citation.volume17en_UK
dc.citation.issue19en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderChief Scientist Officeen_UK
dc.contributor.funderEdinburgh and Lothians Health Foundationen_UK
dc.citation.date07/10/2020en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Leedsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Lothianen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Lothianen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Lothianen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Lothianen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Lothianen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1669473en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-2713-1847en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5282-2941en_UK
dc.date.accepted2020-10-04en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-10-15en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ijerph-17-07305-v2.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.82 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.